My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 5 AND 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
052113
>
15 ATTACHMENT 5 AND 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 2:36:41 PM
Creation date
5/15/2013 4:22:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS 5 AND 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Positas Boulevard which would allow VCHS to continue using that access; it would be a <br />right -in /right -out only but would do great things in terms of separating uses and making <br />the access work. He noted that the primary goal at VCHS was to get this approved as <br />part of this project so it would get built and be coordinated with the construction of the <br />project to minimize conflicts both during construction and after construction. He further <br />noted that the only issue left was how the cost would be allocated, and both parties <br />have reached an agreement this afternoon in this regard. He added that it needs to be <br />memorialized in an agreement. He expressed gratitude that the developer stepped up <br />and said they would undertake the responsibility as part of their project if VCHS helps to <br />pay for it, to which VCHS agreed. <br />Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Inderbitzen the same question she asked St. Anton, if <br />VCHS is comfortable with the conditions as they currently read. <br />Mr. Inderbitzen said yes. He expressed confidence that both parties will be able to work <br />out a final agreement before the project comes before the City Council, which would be <br />VCHS's preference as well. <br />James Paxson, General Manager of Hacienda Business Park, stated that he feels <br />somewhat like he is sounding like a broken record, but that he has the pleasure of <br />coming before the Commission again and say something similar that he has been able <br />to say with all of the recent projects, how exceptionally pleased he is to have a really <br />fine project coming into the Park. He noted that, as has been mentioned by several <br />people and saw in the staff report, this is a tricky site, and to be able to simultaneously <br />bring all of these elements together to come up with such a great project takes a lot of <br />work. He expressed appreciation for the cooperation St. Anton Partners showed with <br />the Park's Design Review Committee in terms of meeting things that the Committee had <br />asked them to look at. He indicated that the developer has brought in an exceptional <br />design team with both KGTY and Gates to work on this site, that type of high caliber <br />representative of the other types of high quality projects that the Commission has seen <br />from Hacienda recently and hopes to continue to see in the future. <br />Mr. Paxson stated that the Park is supportive of the solution that came up with regard to <br />the access. He indicated that the Park's three concerns on that particular component of <br />the project was that it meet the requirements of the Park guidelines: a setback of <br />150 feet from the corner and 42 feet between driveways, both of which were met; and <br />the preservation of the bus turnout and bus shelter, which the developer has assured <br />will be the case. He added that he is totally fine with that particular amendment to the <br />project and that the Park will work with the developer to review and get that approved <br />prior to the City Council meeting. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she would like to preface her motion by saying that <br />she is thrilled with the project and finds it exciting. She noted that she is delighted at the <br />level of affordability and the number of units, and appreciates the developer's work on <br />DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 5/8/13 Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.