My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
052113
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 12:20:21 PM
Creation date
5/14/2013 12:20:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> In 1979, the voters passed Proposition 4 ("Prop 4") with the intent of limiting <br /> government spending. Prop 4 accomplishes this by limiting an agency's ability to keep <br /> and spend its tax revenue based on its base year 1978/79FY spending, adjusted <br /> annually by an inflation factor and the agency's increase in population. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The factors used to compute the Prop 4 limits are: (1) either the percentage change in <br /> California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment <br /> roll from the preceding year due to the addition of local nonresidential construction in <br /> the City, and (2) either the City's own population growth or the population growth of the <br /> entire County. <br /> The State of California Department of Finance annually provides the California per <br /> capita personal income change percentage for purposes of calculal.ing the Prop 4 <br /> Spending Limit. For the 2013/14FY, California per capita personal income increased by <br /> 5.12%. This percentage change does not exceed the 16.72% percentage change in <br /> Pleasanton's local assessment roll due to the increase in the assessed value for non- <br /> residential properties as provided by the County Assessor's office. Alameda County's <br /> population growth of 1.21% exceeds City's population growth of 0.98%. Therefore, the <br /> calculation for the 2013/14FY appropriations limit is based on the percentage change in <br /> the local assessment roll due to non-residential construction and the County's <br /> population growth. The attached Exhibit A details the calculation of the Prop 4 <br /> appropriations limit for the 2013/14FY of $484,380,003. <br /> Submitted by: Approved by: <br /> %-e‘()Cri-/ thz, <br /> Emily E. Wager Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Resolution <br /> 2. 2013/14FY Appropriations Limit Calculation <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.