My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
052113
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 12:16:20 PM
Creation date
5/14/2013 12:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSION <br /> The proposed density meets the General Plan density requirement. The project site is <br /> relatively flat except for the arroyo portion site. The proposed design of the homes <br /> would be similar to the existing Roslyn Estates development located to the immediate <br /> west of the subject site. With the proposed conditions, the proposed development <br /> would minimize the impacts to the adjoining residents. Staff believes that the proposed <br /> PUD development plan meets all applicable requirements of the Pleasanton Municipal <br /> Code and General Plan, and is supported by staff and the Planning Commission. <br /> Submitte by: Fiscal Review: Approved by: <br /> LV <br /> Brian Dolan Emily Wagner Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Community Development Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Draft City Council Ordinance with Exhibit A, Recommended Conditions of <br /> Approval <br /> 2. Proposed PUD Development Plan and supporting documents listed below: <br /> • PUD Development Plan, dated "Received April 5, 2013" <br /> • Roselyn Estates II Design Guidelines, dated "Received April 5, 2013" <br /> • GreenBuilding Checklist <br /> • Letter from California Department of Fish & Wildlife <br /> • Negative Declaration Prepared for PRZ-59 <br /> The following documents are available upon request: <br /> • Arborist's Report by HortiScience, dated "Received September 21, 2012" <br /> • Geotechnical Exploration Report by Engeo, dated "Received September 21, <br /> 2012" <br /> • Hydraulic Evaluation and Bank Erosion Analysis of Arroyo Del Valle by <br /> Engeo, dated "Received September 21, 2012" <br /> • Responses from Engeo Regarding Geotechnical and Slope Stability, Dated <br /> "Received January 17, 2013" and " Received March 6, 2013" <br /> • Phase II Environment Site Assessment, dated "Received January, 30, 2013" <br /> • Peer Review Comments and Report by Kropp & <br /> Associates, Dated "Received March 1, 2013" and "Received March 14, 2013" <br /> • Hydro-Modification Report by DeBolt Civil Engineering, Dated "Received <br /> March 5, 2013" <br /> • Hydro-Modification Outlet by DeBolt Civil Engineering, Dated March 5, 2013" <br /> • IMP Sizing Calculations by DeBolt Civil Engineering, Dated "Received March <br /> 5, 2013" <br /> • Pre-Demolition Asbestos and Lead Inspection Report by Kellco Services, <br /> Dated "Received September 21, 2012" <br /> 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, dated April 24, 2013 (Excerpt) <br /> 4. April 24, 2013, Planning Commission Staff Report without exhibits <br /> 5. Location/Notification Maps <br /> Page 6 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.