My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
052113
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 3:25:45 PM
Creation date
5/14/2013 12:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
relatively unlimited time in their own neighborhood, whereas limited term parking would require them to <br /> monitor and perhaps move their vehicles several times throughout the day. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br /> David Nagler said it is simply a question of to what extent Walnut Drive should be used as a parking lot <br /> for the civic good. He said he fully supports and expects spillover parking during those 15 events per <br /> year which involve closing Main Street, as residents know that comes with downtown living. This, <br /> however, is very different to Walnut Drive's use as a parking lot for an office complex located one half <br /> block away. He said he reviewed the City Council minutes from the time the complex was developed <br /> and the potential impacts were clear at that time. He noted that there were approximately 8 non- <br /> resident vehicles parked on Walnut Drive at 8 a.m. that day, and an approximately equal number of <br /> vacant parking spaces within the office complex lot. He said the real issue is whether or not it is <br /> appropriate for the residents of Walnut to be asked to contribute their curbside as a parking spot for <br /> private enterprise simply by virtue of living on that street. <br /> Gray Prince supported Mr. Nagler's comments. He agreed that occasional City events, which occupy <br /> only part of the day, are a very different impact from all day office parking 5 days a week, 52 weeks per <br /> year. He also noted that during the holiday season, when Walnut Drive is referred to as Candy Cane <br /> Lane, residents make a particular effort not to park on the street so as not to block the decorations. <br /> When employees park on the street until 6 or 7 p.m., it defeats that effort. <br /> Tracy Dunne said one of the first things she noticed as a new Walnut Drive resident was the inordinate <br /> number of non-residential vehicles parked on the street. She said she was told there were promises <br /> made at the time of development of the office complex to hold harmless the residents of Walnut Drive. <br /> She said Walnut Drive does its part to improve the quality of life for Pleasanton residents and they are <br /> simply asking for some reciprocity. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio shared her support for the request. <br /> Councilmember Brown said that given the full support of residents, she would also support the request. <br /> Councilmember Pentin stressed that it was not his intent to question the permit process in this <br /> particular location, only to have a conversation about the process in general and what it affects it might <br /> have on the larger community. He explained that one of his concerns related to the possibility that the <br /> downtown could end up surrounded by permitted parking zones, but he felt this was a unique location <br /> because of the neighboring office complex and something he could support. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Cook-Kallio to adopt a resolution to expand the residential permit <br /> parking program to include Walnut Drive. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 11 of 12 May 7, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.