My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN040213
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN040213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2013 2:34:37 PM
Creation date
5/10/2013 2:34:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/2/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Congressman Swalwell said he very much understood the concerns and agreed with the local <br /> viewpoint, particularly as it relates to education. He said he supports federal programs, but would prefer <br /> to see the expenditure of funds and local implementation of those programs deferred to local experts. <br /> He said he recently submitted an appropriations request for transit security fundirg in order to address <br /> terrorism vulnerabilities in the Bart system, but again believed that BART should have the flexibility to <br /> determine how those funds are best spent. <br /> Rich Cimino expressed concern over the Council's recent letter regarding CEQA reform, at least as it <br /> was reported in The Pleasanton Weekly. He asked and staff confirmed that it was a letter from the City, <br /> rather than Councilmembers as individuals, and that the letter was already released. He said he was <br /> unable to find a published version of the letter and asked if the final product still refers to CEQA <br /> lawsuits as frivolous and to those who would support such lawsuits as radical and extremist. He said he <br /> is an active community participant who has some experience with CEQA related issues and is <br /> concerned about how the Council's words might negatively portray him and others like him. <br /> Mayor Thorne said staff would provide Mr. Cimino with a copy of the letter, after which he was free to <br /> make his own judgments. He said the intent of the letter, which was to reduce duplication CEQA and <br /> newer laws that might govern the same areas and to discourage certain lawsuits that might come about <br /> for frivolous or unrelated reasons, was fairly clear. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said there was no intention to circumvent any process or agency that currently <br /> exists and noted that the Council's recommendation applied only to projects that had been fully vetted <br /> in the public forum. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 10. PUBLIC HEARING: P12-1796, City of Pleasanton — Introduce an ordinance amending Title 18 of <br /> the Pleasanton Municipal Code to create Chapter 18.70, Ridgeline and Hillside Protection and <br /> Preservation, development standards and review procedures for development proposed in the <br /> hillside areas of the City <br /> Community Development Director Dolan presented the staff report, stating that the item relates to <br /> consideration of an ordinance requested by the Council as a means for implementing Measure PP. In <br /> November 2012 the Council held a workshop and provided staff with direction on several issues in <br /> drafting the implementing ordinance. These included the method by which a slope is measured, <br /> determination of whether the limitations on slope in the 25% or greater grade apply to manufactured or <br /> altered slopes, defining of the terms "ridge" and ridgeline," and the determination of whether streets are <br /> "structures" for the purposes of implementing Measure PP. <br /> In January 2013, the Planning Commission held the first of several public hearings regarding the draft <br /> ordinance. Discussion at the Commission level was largely uncontroversial arid in agreement with <br /> many of the Council's points of direction. The Commission agreed with and staff supports to proposed <br /> definition and method of measuring slope, including slope intervals and the City's ability to isolate <br /> certain features such as small mounds or holes that might have a steep slope but can be worked <br /> around. <br /> In its November 2012 workshop, the Council directed that modified slopes have a 25% or greater grade <br /> would be prohibited from development under Measure PP, but also suggested that exceptions could be <br /> granted upon review. The Commission was uncomfortable with the exception process and alternatively <br /> recommended that such properties should be considered based on what could be determined as the <br /> original grade, thereby making the exception process unnecessary. The Commission also received <br /> testimony suggesting that the inventory of slopes on land affected by Measure PP be completed and <br /> included in the ordinance. Staff believes this to be time consuming and potentially controversial but is <br /> prepared to proceed if that is the Council's direction. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 11 April 2, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.