Laserfiche WebLink
"Develop a ridgeline preservation ordinance and scenic hillside design guidelines to improve <br /> safety and reduce the potential negative visual impacts of development in hilly areas." <br /> Central to this policy is the improvement of safety and the negative visual impacts of <br /> development. Nowhere in this policy is there any stated exclusion for roadways. <br /> Furthermore, there is no policy in either the 1996 Circulation Element or Public Safety <br /> Element that indicates building roadways on geologically unstable slopes, landslide areas, or <br /> terrain with slopes greater than 25% enhances safety in any way, shape, or form. <br /> Policy on Prohibiting Development or Construction on Slopes of 25% of Greater <br /> In 2005, the Pleasanton Planning Commission discussed safety hazards and collapsing <br /> hillsides and directed staff to have policies put in place to "prohibit major grading where existing <br /> slopes are 25% or greater" and that "development should not be encouraged on 25 percent slopes or <br /> areas prone to landslides."4 <br /> This corresponds to PARC positions on slopes and safety discussed at the City Council <br /> meeting 40 years ago: 5 "Develop only geologically stable lands of moderate slope (under 25% <br /> slope). This is the proposal which is closest to the Pleasanton Planning Staff and our Citizens <br /> Advisory Committee. It is also the alternative recommended by the County Planning Department. " <br /> PARC in a 2006 Joint City Council-Planning Commission meeting reiterated its position: <br /> "These policies did not allow development on hillsides of 25% slope or greater.... General Plan land <br /> use decisions made on a case-by-case basis for such a major area of the City, visually important to all <br /> residents, seems unwise. Case-by-case decisions lead to unreasonable speculation on land. PARC <br /> urges Council to go back to the previous General Plan designation, which does not allow development <br /> on slopes of 25% or greater and excludes these slopes from calculation." 6 <br /> 100 Vertical Feet from a Ridgeline <br /> PARC objects to the revised definitions of ridgeline. It also objects to the revised language <br /> concerning distance from the top of the structure to the ridgeline. <br /> The distance from the ridgeline to the structure must be 100 vertical, not from the ridgeline to <br /> the the bottom of the grading for the actual lot; otherwise, the structure will protrude over the <br /> natural terrain of the ridgeline (see diagram below). <br /> 4 Planning Commission Minutes/Pleasanton-7/25'2005 <br /> 5 City Council Minutes/Pleasanton-10/08/1973 <br /> City Council-Planning Commission Minutes/Pleasanton-4/25/2006 <br /> 5 <br />