My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050713
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2013 4:34:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2013 4:34:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked and Mr. Kang confirmed that the tree vegetation on the site renderings is <br /> representative of the proposed landscape. <br /> With regard to whether the size of the retail spaces would attract the desired tenants, Mr. lnderbitzen <br /> said he was confident it would. He said the proposed size is really of function of moving the retail into a <br /> high visibility area on the corner where it is easily accessible to traffic. In order to get a reasonable <br /> setback in that location, the edges of the building had to be reduced to less than 40 feet. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said she has heard of a number of mixed retail developments that ultimately <br /> were not successful and asked if there is a change in that trend. <br /> Mr. Inderbitzen said this is a much different concept. He explained that in residential over retail <br /> developments like what has gone into Dublin, developers consider it almost throwaway retail because <br /> they put it in knowing it won't rent but that they need it to get the project approved. This proposal calls <br /> for dedicated stand alone retail that was located and designed to work for the types of uses that can <br /> serve the development. <br /> Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br /> Patricia Belding, Citizens for a Caring Community, took issue with certain elements of the Affordable <br /> Housing Agreement. She noted that of the 305 apartment units, 46 are described as affordable <br /> however 23 of those are at 100% AMI. After deducting those 23 units that are not truly affordable, the <br /> project has affordability level of only 7%, which is incredibly low for a development of this type and <br /> zoning. She asked that the City insist on the proper level of affordability as an example for other <br /> projects that will follow. She also requested that the Council postpone a decision on the project until <br /> after the joint workshop with the Housing Commission in May and direct staff to expedite the nexus <br /> study in order to create a revised tool to develop workforce housing in Pleasanton. She referred to a <br /> letter submitted to the Council by Becky Dennis which lists the 4 alternatives provided by the IZO to <br /> ensure construction of much needed affordable units. She reminded the Council that Pleasanton has at <br /> least one example of successful development using the land dedication option and recommended that <br /> they consider partnering non-profit with for profit developers to create another project of this type. <br /> Becky Dennis, Citizens for a Caring Community, said the proposal is very different from what she <br /> expected this site to yield. She suggested that if the Council crafted an ordinance requiring market rate <br /> developers of the recently rezoned properties to partner with a non-profit, they would achieve far more <br /> than the 15% affordability target. She said this site was a favorite of those who participated in the <br /> Housing Element update process as a place to make a significant contribution to the City's fair share of <br /> housing requirements, not a place for luxury apartments with a low level of affordability. She said the <br /> applicant has proposed a beautiful project and encouraged the Council to approve the design and <br /> Development Agreement, but to postpone the Affordable Housing Agreement until after the workshop <br /> with the Housing Commission. If approved now, she said the level of affordability of all projects that <br /> follow will decline and the fee rules would change. She asked whether the applicant was ever asked <br /> about partnering with a non-profit or if staff insisted they pursue the least enforceable option in the IZO. <br /> Sean Sowell said he preferred Option 2 over Option 1 but agreed with previous speakers that 100% <br /> AMI does not constitute affordable. He noted that neither Option 1, 2 nor the revised Option 2 contain <br /> any 2 or 3 bedroom units at 50% AMI. He echoed requests to postpone a decision until after the joint <br /> workshop. He acknowledged and respected the importance of parks but said that affordable housing is <br /> the higher priority and suggested redirecting some of the park fees in order to increase affordability. <br /> James Paxson, Hacienda Business Park, expressed his appreciation for the applicant's efforts to <br /> prepare a project that fits nicely with the surrounding environment. He said the proposed project is <br /> City Council Minutes Page 18 of 23 April 16, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.