My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050713
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2013 4:34:44 PM
Creation date
5/1/2013 4:34:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmember Brown <br /> Absent: One Vacancy <br /> Councilmember Pentin said he read the intent of PP to describe construction 100 feet from the top of <br /> the ridgeline. He said the initiative did not stipulate whether that starts with the roof or pad elevation, the <br /> City has always measured from the pad elevation and he did not support the Commission's <br /> recommendation. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said she asked two members of Planning Commission to walk her through their <br /> logic on this issue and that ultimately, the addition of a horizontal element po:entially expands the <br /> restrictions of PP beyond the original intent. She noted that the text of initiative speaks to preventing <br /> grading and that you grade for a pad, not the roof, of a structure and concurred with Councilmember <br /> Pentin. <br /> Councilmember Brown disagreed. She said that view sheds of the ridgelines were critical to the <br /> argument for PP and that 38 foot tall residence with a steeply sloped roof could very much impair those <br /> views. She said she very much supported the Commission's recommendation. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked if he could provide evidence that this perspective was shared with and <br /> voted on by the public. <br /> Councilmember Brown said PP was clear in its effort to protect Pleasanton ridges and their views. <br /> Councilmember Pentin suggested that it would have been more appropriate to adjust for current <br /> practice and increase the vertical setback to 150 feet. <br /> Mayor Thorne said that in his experience with construction this sort of thing is always measured dirt to <br /> dirt, because what they are actually measuring is grading. He suggested that if the goal is to protect <br /> views of the hills, it would be more appropriate to limit building heights as a condition of approval on <br /> projects as they come forward. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Cook-Kallio that the ridgeline setback is the continuous horizontal <br /> ground line measured 100 vertical feet below the ridgeline. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: Councilmember Brown <br /> Absent: One Vacancy <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said it is a constant struggle for elected officials to do what is right for the <br /> greater good of the entire community, not just two neighborhoods. She said it is important to realize that <br /> while the Council is being asked to define the term "road," the public's investment really comes down to <br /> the traffic situation in two neighborhoods. She assured the public that she considered the issue <br /> carefully, walking the neighborhoods with residents, developers and staff. She also downloaded copies <br /> of the General Plan, Municipal Code, California Building Code, and California Public Resource and <br /> Zoning Codes to review references to structures and roads. She found that it is relatively easy to cherry <br /> pick a definition that suits your goal but also that in reading the entire section or chapter, it is clear that <br /> these references and definitions are not meant to be generalized. <br /> She noted that the General Plan mentions structures a number of times but never defines a road as <br /> such. She spoke with several engineers with whom she has no prior acquaintance and found that the <br /> commonly held definition is that roads are infrastructure, not structures. Infrastructure is defined as <br /> public works that connect communities together for economic benefit, networking, quality of life and <br /> safety. She referred to a letter to the Council from Brock Ruby which talked about the unintended <br /> City Council Minutes Page 11 of 23 April 16, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.