My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050113 WORKSHOP
>
ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 12:43:10 PM
Creation date
4/25/2013 11:19:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
ATTACHMENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. It May Get Harder to Support <br /> Inclusion Through In-Lieu Fees <br /> Most communities with inclusionary housing policies <br /> allow developers the option of satisfying their <br /> inclusionary requirements by paying an "in-lieu fee," <br /> i <br /> rather than constructing new affordable homes. Often . <br /> fee revenue is deposited in a housing trust fund and is 1 ? <br /> used to facilitate construction of units elsewhere for <br /> low- and moderate-income households, or to achieve ' �� 1+ <br /> other affordable housing goals. j ` ,' �� �J �: <br /> Often, the in-lieu fee is set low enough that developers <br /> prefertopaythefeeratherthanproducetheinclusionary . <br /> units themselves.Various problems can follow. i <br /> The primary issue with an overreliance on in-lieu fees ._ <br /> is that it can work against the goal of creating inclusive <br /> communities, particularly if fees are used to support <br /> affordable housing outside the area where new market- "� , <br /> rate development is occurring. ,, <br /> The challenge of using in-lieu fees to further the goals <br /> of inclusivity is compounded in infill settings, where � -- <br /> new development is increasingly focused. Infill areas ,i7.E <br /> often have a limited number of available sites at which a -' j <br /> separate,affordable housing developer could use lieu-fee SOMA Grand was built in 2007 with 246 luxury <br /> revenues to produce affordable homes.56 And when sites condominiums.Located in San Francisco,it includes 29 <br /> are available, they are less likely to be pric:ed affordably, below-market-rate units sold to households earning at or <br /> given heightened competition from other developers. below median income. <br /> A second challenge is that in-lieu fees are sometimes set This is not to say that fee options are inherently <br /> too low to produce an equal number of affordable units unhelpful.To the contrary, in-lieu fee revenues can help <br /> elsewhere in the community—regardless of the setting.57 jurisdictions address diverse housing needs that would <br /> otherwise go unmet througt inclusionary housing. <br /> A third issue is that some communities lack local,affordable By working in partnership inith affordable housing <br /> housing developers with the capacity to use fee revenues developers, in-lieu revenues :an be combined with <br /> to produce new affordable homes. As a result, it is not other public funds to support larger-unit developments <br /> uncommon for fee revenues to be used for downpayment for families, service-enriched housing for people with <br /> assistance or other forms of housing support that are special needs, or homes for extremely low-income <br /> less geographically targeted, less directed toward lower- households — all of which are rare and challenging in <br /> income households, and often accompanied by shorter mixed-income developments.59 And fee revenues can <br /> affordability terms than inclusionary housing programs. be used to create affordable re ital units in jurisdictions <br /> where these types of homes are not being produced <br /> When sites are hard to find, fees are set too low, local by inclusionary housing — for example in states like <br /> capacity is constrained, or political support is lagging, California and Colorado,where t is now illegal to require <br /> inclusionary fee revenues can linger unspent for years. developers to price-control rentals directly. Fees used to <br /> This has been a particular problem in New Jersey, for support off-site affordable rental housing furthermore <br /> example. Since 1990, the state's municipalities have leverage the expertise that affordable housing developers <br /> collected more than $442 million in fees-in-lieu, but have in managing affordable rentals.60 <br /> only 15 percent of these funds have been spent on new <br /> affordable housing development. More than a quarter The challenge in the years ahead will be to find ways to <br /> of municipalities collected fees but never expended a ensure that in-lieu revenues are used to meet a broad <br /> single dollar. A majority of the remaining jurisdictions range of housing needs while still supporting mixed- <br /> have spent their fee revenues, but not on affordable income communities, rather than creating a deeper <br /> housing construction.58 pattern of segregated affordable housing. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.