My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
050113 WORKSHOP
>
ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 12:43:10 PM
Creation date
4/25/2013 11:19:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
ATTACHMENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- it is worth taking a closer look at other ways that 5. Rising Homeownership Association <br /> jurisdictions may be able to offset higher per-unit and Condominium Fees <br /> development costs,in addition to the venerable density <br /> bonus. Promising ideas include: Arelatedchallengeto the higher costs ofinfilldevelopment <br /> is the rising cost of homeownership association (HOA) <br /> • streamlining the entitlement process to reduce fees and special assessments in multifamily buildings. <br /> risks (for example, the risk that a hoped-for zoning <br /> variance may not be granted); A growing number of high-amerity, luxury developments <br /> are being built in urban settings.Multiple jurisdictions have <br /> • relaxing lot coverage, public space, and parking had problems with HOA fees in these and other properties <br /> requirements in these settings; rising beyond what owners of inclusionary units can afford. <br /> • facilitating off-site construction of inclusionary units Often the challenge is not so much that fees are prohibitively <br /> within a mile or less of the market rate development; high at the initial point of sale,since fees are often part of <br /> the overall price calculation for inclusionary for-sale units, <br /> • allowing slightly higher rent payments and/or and accordingly must be affordable for targeted income <br /> higher income targeting for inclusionary units in brackets. The bigger challenge is that HOA and condo <br /> these settings; associations will increase fees arid assessments once the <br /> developer is out of the picture. Inclusionary owners get <br /> • reducing the inclusionary requirements for tall outvoted and find themselves shouldering substantial fees <br /> buildings;and that can sometimes rival mortgage payments. <br /> • providing property tax abatement and other Rising fees and special assessments undercut the <br /> financial assistance for these developments. affordability of inclusionary units for both existing owners <br /> The applicability of each offset will certainly vary from and future homebuyers.Jurisdictions struggle to prevent <br /> place to place, as high market prices and tall height or even just stay apprised of these cost increases.And for <br /> limits in some communities may allow developers to jurisdictions committed to maintaining the affordability <br /> absorb higher per-unit costs more easily than in other of their inclusionary housing stock - ownership as well <br /> communities. as rental - the cost of offsetting higher fees can be <br /> exorbitant, compromising a municipality's ability to <br /> promote affordability elsewhere in its jurisdiction.51 <br /> The recently completed Wesmont Station community it Wood-Ridge(NJ)is walking <br /> distance to a new transit station under construction, and includes 15 percent of homes <br /> .. 4)r affordable to low and very low income households. .i <br /> l <br /> . -, , ^ e' ! b 14' ^�N ''°1 jam... <br /> 141,1 v !.1, ` , <br /> P <br /> .. ,� d t <br /> I�l <br /> 7 xa x ' j;4 i'' I <br /> r" <br /> 0 <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.