Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, ALAMEDA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 03-088 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF GREG AND <br />NANCY CROFTON, AS FILED UNDER CASE PADR-729 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />on June 11, 2003, the Planning Commission approved the application of Greg and <br />Nancy Crofton to construct an approximately 1,457-square foot, two-story <br />addition to an existing two-story house located at 4757 Peaceful Lane; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the property is zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) - MDR (Medium Density <br /> Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, within the time specified by the Pleasanton Municipal Code, an appeal of the <br /> Planning Commission's decision was filed; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on July 15, 2003, <br /> at which time all pertinent testimony and documents were reviewed; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br /> California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council determined that the proposed addition is within the parameters of <br />the PUD development plan and would have minimal impact upon the adjacent <br />property; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: <br /> <br />Approves Case PADR-729, the application of Greg and Nancy Crot~on to <br />construct an approximately 1,457-square foot, two-story addition to an existing <br />two-story house located at 4757 Peaceful Lane, subject to the conditions shown in <br />Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made part of this case by reference. <br /> <br />Section 2: <br /> <br />The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this resolution to the appellant <br />with a notice that the appellant has ninety (90) days following the date of adoption <br />of this resolution in which to seek judicial review of this action of the City <br />Council. <br /> <br /> <br />