My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
040213
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 2:59:22 PM
Creation date
4/15/2013 3:23:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/2/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Document Relationships
17
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\041613
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Gonzales SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> Provided to the City Council <br /> From: Joanne Hall <br /> ent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:09 AM After Distribution of Packet <br /> ro: Randi Dalton; Mayor and City Council _ _ �j <br /> Cc: Maria Hoey; Pleasanton City Cle to ` - <br /> Subject: RE: <br /> Dear Ms. Dalton, <br /> Thank you very much for your valuable input regarding Item l0 on the upcoming City Council agenda. This message <br /> acknowledges receipt of your email. Please rest assured that the City Council will have the benefit of your comments. <br /> Kind Regards, <br /> Joanne Hall <br /> Public Information Officer <br /> City of Pleasanton <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Randi Dalton [ <br /> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:06 AM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Cc: <br /> Subject: <br /> For Our Mayor and City Council: <br /> My family and I have lived in Pleasanton for the past nine years. One of our daughters was a proud Foothill graduate in <br /> 2010 and is now attending the University of Oregon. The other will graduate this year and go on to college in the fall. <br /> Living in this city has been good for us. <br /> Pleasanton offers a great combination of opportunity within the city along with the feelings of safeness and closeness <br /> within our community. I feel strongly about maintaining this balance and therefore, strongly object to destroying our <br /> hills, losing much of the beauty of our city, creating more traffic, etc.. <br /> I was under the impression that the majority of our residents and voters agreed with my feelings, as Measure PP was <br /> passed.The city chose to save our hills and we voted for a way to ensure that this would happen. I do not comprehend <br /> how this can still be open for discussion or how the discussion is regarding the definitions of streets/roads and <br /> structures. <br /> The definition of street is very clear. A street/road is an artificial monument (as supported by the Kaplan book on <br /> California Real Estate Principles). And, an artificial monument includes structures erected by man. Therefore, a street is a <br /> structure. It all is quite straightforward even though the minutiae of the definitions is not even relevant. The intent of <br /> Measure PP was very clear and it is still what the voters want. <br /> Please support the voters of our city. <br /> ,espectfully, <br /> Randi Dalton <br /> <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.