SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

SUPPLEMENTAL'S- AL I'JIA ERIAL Provided to the City Council Karen Gonzales AWN. 2t n., of P irknt From: Maria Lara on behalf of Mayor and City Council Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:42 PM Pate / To: Pleasanton City Clerk; Maria Hoey Subject: FW: Letter to Mayor and City Council - Roads are Structures Attachments: Attachment A- 06-17-2008CityofPleasantonMeasurePPAnalysis.pclf; Attachment C - UGB.jpg; ATTACHMENT B.doc Maria Lara Assistant to the City Manager (925)931-5009 City of Pleasanton P.O. Box 520 Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 www.pleasantonrecycles.org From: Anne Fox [ Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:38 PM To: Mayor and City Council; Mayor and City Council Cc: Livermore Independent Subject: Letter to Mayor and City Council - Roads are Structures Dear Mayor and City Council, When the city council wrote Measure QQ that received a majority vote of the people, but less votes than Measure PP, the city council committed that any subsequent regulations would be completed by November 2009. In fact, nothing was done between November 2008 and November 2009. Now it appears that the city staff, four and a half years after the voters adopted Measure PP, is attempting to nullify Measure PPs' original intent as well as place far more density on hillside sites than the original July 17, 2008 analysis of hillside sites Staff Report completed by city staff. Staff Analysis of Impacts of Measure PP On June 17, 2008, the city manager and planning director Dolan signed an official city staff report on the impact of Measure PP. It included at which the attached Dwelling Unit reductions due to Measure PP. I have attached that Table in Attachment A. In this analysis, Lund Ranch II could contain at most 10 housing units. If the roadway is built from Sunset Creek which has a substantial drop down through the property and exceeds 25% slope, only 10 units can be built on Lund Ranch II. The city must stand by its analysis. If the city council determines the staff analysis was false and misleading, it needs to take disciplinary action against the preparers of this city report. Given that this was an officially published staff report, it is quite possible that the city will be subject to legal action if it allows more Dwelling Units on Lund Ranch II than was published in this report. 1