Laserfiche WebLink
Ranch II would not be constructed through that neighborhood. This agreement was memorialized as Condition <br /> of Approval No. 30 for the Bonde Ranch subdivision (PUD-90-18). These negotiations were also the basis of <br /> planning for the North Sycamore Specific Plan, which stated that permanent access to Lund Ranch II would be <br /> via Sycamore Creek Lane. While this agreement may not be legally binding on Greenbrier, it is the foundation <br /> of over 20 years of planning in this area and a commitment that the city made to this neighborhood that should <br /> be kept. <br /> The result of this would be that Lund Ranch II could be developed as a ten unit project as an exemption to <br /> Measure PP. However, it is my understanding— although I have not visited the site to confirm this—is that the <br /> portion of the route from Sycamore Creek Lane to Lund Ranch II that exceeds 25% slope is very small and <br /> limited to a drainage ditch. If this is the case, the former Council provided flexibility in its direction to exempt <br /> "minor irregularities" from the 25% slope limitation. This may be an option if the finding can be made. <br /> Finally, I agree with the Planning Commission recommendation that the 100' limitation should be measured <br /> from the top of structures. Measure PP was all about protecting view shed and ridge lines, therefore the <br /> regulations should ensure that the entire structure of any development should be clear of the 100' limitation. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 2 <br />