Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> additional work that could be done, especially about it being a sustainable project. He <br /> noted that there are some areas that he thinks are feasible that should tie included and <br /> suggested that photovoltaic (PV) panels as well as the solar water heaters be required <br /> to be installed for all the units, and if the applicant comes back and can demonstrate <br /> that it is not feasible, then the Director of Community Development Director could have <br /> some latitude to modify that requirement. He added that Energy Star appliances and <br /> sub-metering for water usage for all the residential units within the development be <br /> required as well. He recommended that Condition No. 10 regarding reclaimed water be <br /> modified to require the applicant to do the proper plumbing to use the reclaimed water <br /> when available. <br /> Chair Blank agreed with the suggestions for reclaimed water, sub-metering, and Energy <br /> Star appliances when available. He indicated, however, that having done this for a <br /> while, he is reluctant to require the installation of PV panels and solar water heaters, <br /> knowing that pre-wiring for PV and pre-plumbing for solar water heaters are basically a <br /> bolt-on. <br /> Commissioner Posson explained that his rationale is that since they are rental units, he <br /> does not see what the incentive would be for the building operator to install the solar as <br /> a retrofit because they are not going to get any benefit from that, but the residents <br /> would in their utility bills. He noted that if they are not installed now, he does not see <br /> where the economic incentive would be for them to install it at a later date. He added <br /> that if they were condominium or housing units, he would be fine with their meeting <br /> Title 24 requirements and installing only the wiring and plumbing to accommodate these <br /> and then letting the owner of the property make that determination. <br /> Chair Blank noted that was a really good point. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor commented that Commissioner Posson's statements make a <br /> lot of sense because there is no incentive for the builder to install the PVs and solar <br /> water heaters after the fact, and the cost just gets passed onto the renter. As for the <br /> rest of the project as he has seen it, he stated that he was pretty impressed with the <br /> fantastic job the developer has done and the nice complex they have came up with. He <br /> indicated that he understands the whole argument about affordability and that Option 1 <br /> would give about 12 to 15 percent, while Option 2 at 15 percent does not give quite as <br /> deep an affordability. He noted, however, that 15 percent has been the City's <br /> guidelines, and this is really not within the Planning Commission's purview. He stated <br /> that in this respect, he thinks the Planning Commission needs to step back from the <br /> affordability piece and let the Housing Commission send its recommendation to the <br /> Council. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she really likes the project and after seeing the color <br /> board, is happy with the mustard-yellow color, which looks a lot different than what she <br /> saw at the Work Session, and prefers it to adding the other color to soften it. With <br /> respect to the installation of the PV panels and solar water heater, she indicated that <br /> she understands Commissioner Posson's point, but she is trying to figure out where the <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 3/27/2013 Page 17 of 22 <br />