My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT D <br /> THE CITY OF Housing Commission <br /> Agenda Report <br /> pLEASANTON0 March 21 , 2013 <br /> Item 08 <br /> SUBJECT: Approval of an Affordable Housing Agreement <br /> with Pleasanton Partners for a 305-Unit Apartment <br /> Development at 4452 Rosewood Drive (PUD-85-08- <br /> 1D-4M) [CONTINUED ITEM] <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached affordable housing agreement <br /> (based on Option 2) with Pleasanton Partners, LLC, <br /> and recommend that it be approved by the City <br /> Council as part of the PUD approval process. <br /> ATTACHMENTS: 1. Recommended Affordable Housing Agreement <br /> 2. February 21, 2013, Agenda Report <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> At your February 21 meeting, the Commission reviewed a staff recommendation regarding an <br /> Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) for the proposed 305-unit apartment complex located <br /> 8.4-acres of the California Center property (CARR America). As an outcome of this review, the <br /> Commission expressed concern that the proposed terms did not meet it; expectations and <br /> therefore, it requested staff meet again with the developer to explore further alternatives. Since <br /> that time, staff, including the City Manager, City Attorney and Director of Community <br /> Development, have met with the developer on a number of occasions in an attempt to develop <br /> an affordability level and unit mix that most closely reflects the intent of the City's Inclusionary <br /> Zoning Ordinance, City development standards and design guidelines, and the Commission's <br /> interest. As an outcome of those discussions staff is presenting the Commission with two <br /> options. The first (Option 1) is the same affordable housing plan presented at your February 21 <br /> meeting and reflected in Attachment 2. The second is the revised plan (Option 2) that meets the <br /> City's IZO goal of 15% affordable units. The attached February 21, 2013, agenda report <br /> provides related background material for the overall development. <br /> A summary of these two options is as follows: <br /> Page- I - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.