My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Plan <br /> The project complies with minimum building setbacks and the community buildings have been <br /> centrally located to provide easy access to all residents. The retail buildings and retail plaza will <br /> provide a focal point for the corner. The office parking garage has been positioned to minimize <br /> its visibility from roadways and adjacent properties. Overall, staff believes that the proposed <br /> site plan and positioning of the buildings are appropriate for the subject property. <br /> Floor Area Ratio <br /> The Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines indicate that there is no FAR <br /> applicable for the residential/retail project. With respect to the office portion of the site, the <br /> Hacienda Guidelines exempt parking structures from inclusion in the FAR calculation. Since <br /> the property would not be subdivided, the FAR for the existing office building area would not <br /> change (the current office FAR is 38.3%, which conforms to the 40% maximum allowed). <br /> Open Space/Amenities <br /> The project includes several active and passive recreation areas and amenities. Interior <br /> recreation areas and amenities include a fitness building with yoga studio, a community room <br /> with kitchen, a bike shop, business center, and two common rooms in the podium building. <br /> Exterior recreation and amenity areas include a pool, spa, seating areas, barb eque area, bocce <br /> ball court, children's play area with play equipment, and two common greens. The podium <br /> building would also have a plaza area along the Owens Drive frontage and a central open space <br /> area with various seating areas, pavilion with kitchen, and fireplace feature. A retail plaza area <br /> would be located at the corner of Owens and Rosewood Drives. Residents of the project would <br /> also be able use nearby public parks: Owens Plaza Park is across Owens Drive in the Archstone <br /> Apartment project and Creekside Park is just a bit farther away to the southeast and is accessible <br /> via an existing public trail. <br /> The Standards require a minimum of 250 sq. ft. of group open space per dwelling unit (305 units <br /> x 250 = 76,250 sq. ft.). Private open space is not required, but, if provided, it can be deducted <br /> from the group open space requirement at a 2:1 ratio (i.e., 1 sq. ft. of private open space = 2 sq. <br /> ft. of group open space). The project would provide 49,373 sq. ft. of group open space and <br /> 22,862 sq. ft. of private open space, which is equivalent to a total of 95,097 sq. ft. of group open <br /> space. Therefore, the project complies with the open space requirements. The residents would <br /> have access to even more open space than the above total as the common green area north of the <br /> podium building and the northern portion of the central hub open space area and bocce ball court <br /> were excluded from the open space calculation as they are located on the office portion of the <br /> property. <br /> At the work session, two Commissioners suggested that a children's activity area be provided in <br /> the podium central open space area. The applicant did not add a children's activity area in the <br /> podium open space because it would create unwanted noise for the podium residents in the <br /> adjacent units (particularly since it is an enclosed area surrounded by four-story walls), the <br /> PUD-85-08-1 D-4M Page - 13 - March 27, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.