My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Does the Planning Commission support the use of shared office/residential spaces to meet <br /> some of the required residential parking? <br /> The Commission supported the use of shared office/residential spaces and some <br /> Commissioners indicated that they would prefer more shared parking. <br /> D. Are the proposed on-site recreation facilities and amenities acceptable? <br /> The Commission generally felt the on-site recreation facilities and amenities were <br /> acceptable. Two Commissioners suggested that a children's activity area be provided in the <br /> podium central open space area. <br /> E. Are the building designs, colors and materials, and heights acceptable? <br /> The Commission generally felt that the building designs, colors and materials, and heights <br /> were acceptable. One Commissioner requested that more of the "Pleasanton look" be <br /> incorporated into the building design, if possible. One Commissioner questioned whether <br /> the mustard color was appropriate. The Commission requested that large paint sample chips <br /> be provided when the project is brought back for its formal review. A Commissioner <br /> requested that good visual simulations be provided when the project is brought back for its <br /> formal review (e.g., a video showing the project as you drove by and then into the project). <br /> The applicant informed staff that a video simulation would be very expensive and instead <br /> has provided additional photo simulations of the project. In addition, the applicant will have <br /> a 3D computer model of the project available at the hearing and the applicant will be able to <br /> provide a 3D image of any area of the project desired by the Commission, including internal <br /> views. <br /> Work Session Public Comment <br /> One member of the public, James Paxson, General Manager of the Hacienda Owners <br /> Association, spoke in favor of the project. <br /> II. SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> Subject Property and Surrounding Area <br /> The approximately 60.9-acre California Center site is located at 4400-4460 Rosewood Drive, <br /> within Hacienda Business Park. The site fronts on Rosewood and Owens Drives (see Figures 1 <br /> and 2 on the following pages). The site was developed in 1987-88 for AT&T and currently <br /> contains six multi-story office buildings totaling approximately 966,531 sq. i3., an <br /> approximately 36,313 sq. ft. cafeteria building, an approximately 14,007 sq. ft. conference <br /> building, and related site improvements (surface parking spaces, ornamental vegetation, etc.). <br /> PUD-85-08-1D-4M Page - 3 - March 27, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.