My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2013 4:41:37 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 2:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
Document Relationships
10
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\040213
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\040213
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ridgeline Setback <br /> (Varies Due to Slope) <br /> Ridgeline Setback(Vanes <br /> Ridgeline Due to Slope) <br /> (Elevation Varies) <br /> O 0 <br /> No Structures Are Allowed The top of the house shall not extend <br /> in the Ridgeline Setback Areas above the closest ridgeline setback, <br /> Y o w J and may be allowed below the ridgeline <br /> — ^_ � setback on slopes less than 25- <br /> percent. <br /> wC—. cc /p <br /> E <br /> cla <br /> :aa °' N <br /> Figure 4: Slope Cross Section with the Ridgeline Setback. <br /> 2. Roads Included in Specific Plans <br /> Planning Commission Recommendation <br /> Measure PP supersedes the General Plan and the Specific Plans referenced by <br /> the General Plan that were adopted prior to November 2008. Roads are <br /> structures and cannot be constructed on the hillside areas prohibited by Measure <br /> PP from development. <br /> Staff Response <br /> Staff does not concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation. <br /> Staff previously recommended the proposed Code Chapter exempt roads <br /> anticipated by PUD Development Plans and Specific Plans approved before <br /> November 2008. In consultation with the City Attorney's Office prior to the March <br /> 13th Planning Commission public hearing, the Planning Division staff determined <br /> that this "grandfathering" of roads previously anticipated by plans and <br /> developments may not be a defensible implementation of Measure PP for the <br /> following reason: Measure PP supersedes the General Plan and the Specific <br /> Plans referenced by the General Plan. If roads are structures, they cannot be <br /> constructed on the hillside areas prohibited by Measure PP from development. <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.