Laserfiche WebLink
themselves organized and now, to protect them from cut-through traffic, right turns are <br /> not allowed come out of Raley's during certain periods of times without violating the <br /> Municipal Code. He pointed out that there are things that can be done. <br /> Commissioner Narum commented that she thinks one of the things on this that is really <br /> hard is about the neighborhood promises that were made. She stated that she is <br /> hearing from legal that the Commission's hands are kind of tied because of the <br /> language in Measure PP that states that it supersedes everything from the General Plan <br /> on down, and this is one of the unintended consequences of having a measure like this <br /> that everyone is somewhat concerned about. She asked Ms. Harryman to comment on <br /> this. <br /> Ms. Harryman stated that she hears what Commissioner Narum is saying. She <br /> indicated that the language in Measure PP is clear that if there is a conflict between <br /> something that was in the General Plan before and what Measure PP says, then <br /> Measure PP overrides it. She continued that in this case, as it plays out, depending on <br /> how it is defined this evening, it can affect whether or not Sycamore Creek Way is an <br /> exit for Lund Ranch II or not, based on the slopes there. <br /> Chair Blank stated that there could be other exits. He inquired how this would be if <br /> Lund Ranch II only had ten homes. <br /> Ms. Harryman replied that Measure PP would not apply, and Lund Ranch II could go out <br /> numerous ways and have numerous options. <br /> Chair Blank commented that Lund Ranch would still be subject to review, and it cannot <br /> just do whatever it wants. <br /> Ms. Harryman stated that Measure PP specifically states that it does not apply to <br /> projects of ten homes or less, and, therefore, it would not apply to Lund Ranch if it <br /> builds only ten homes. She clarified that Lund Ranch would have more options, and <br /> only the rules on the books would apply. <br /> Commissioner Pearce moved to find that the proposed amendment to Title 18 is <br /> categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines <br /> Section 15308, Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment <br /> and to recommend approval to the City Council of the Draft Chapter 18.70, <br /> Ridgeline and Hillside Protection Preservation, Exhibit A, dated February 13, 2013 <br /> with the following modifications: (1) Structures, except copulas, chimneys, or <br /> other appurtenances, shall be measured from the top of the structure to the top of <br /> the ridge behind the structure; (2) References to exemptions for planned roads be <br /> removed from the proposed ordinance, and roads shall be considered structures <br /> for purposes of implementing Measure PP; and (3) Recommend to the City <br /> Council that it consider creating an inventory of ridgelines on properties that <br /> would be subject to Measure PP, to be referenced in the ordinance. <br /> Chair Blank seconded the motion. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 31 of 35 <br />