Laserfiche WebLink
to dispose of surface water without damage to private or public properties, streets, or <br /> alleys." She stated that streets, therefore, are considered structures as well and not <br /> access drives. She urged the Commission to follow the intent of Measure PP. <br /> George Dort stated that he is and has been a member of the Ventana Hills Steering <br /> Committee since its inception in 1991 and a resident of Pleasanton for over 25 years. <br /> He added that he was on the original Ridge Committee to save the Main and <br /> Pleasanton Ridge, and is very proud of that. <br /> Mr. Dort stated that there are many neighbors present in the audience from Ventana <br /> Hills and Mission Park to support staff's recommendation to adopt P12-1796, Exhibit A, <br /> the Draft Municipal Code Amendment, Chapter 18.70; the Ridgeline and Hillside <br /> Protection and Preservation, dated March 13, 2013 into the City Code. He indicated <br /> that they believe it adheres to Measures PP and QQ to protect the ridgelines, contrary <br /> to other opinions stated tonight, and also allows for previous agreements and <br /> understandings by previous Councils, staff, and Planning Commissions dating back to <br /> 1991 with regard to traffic flow for new construction in the southeastern Pleasanton to <br /> be upheld. <br /> Shareef Mandavi stated that he wanted to thank Councilmember McGovern for bringing <br /> some context and history as to what Measures PP and QQ were all about. He indicated <br /> that he is just an ordinary person who voted for Measure PP and that he would be <br /> willing to bet that most of the people in the audience also voted for Measure PP. He <br /> noted that he is also a good friend of people over in Ventana Hills and Mission Hills and <br /> empathize with their position. <br /> Mr. Mandavi stated that he thinks one needs to look at the intention and rally cry behind <br /> Measure PP, which was "save our hills." He pointed out that it was very simple and <br /> very easy to understand, and he is actually stunned and confused that some four to five <br /> years later, staff is talking about extreme minutia and interpretation, reminiscent of when <br /> a President was being impeached around the meaning of the word "is." He indicated <br /> that it seems to him that staff is getting away from the original intention of the <br /> amendment of Measure PP which was just to not build in the hills, something that all <br /> these neighborhoods would agree upon. He pointed out that it is the will of the people, <br /> with nearly 60 percent of the votes, and Measure QQ, which was known anecdotally as <br /> the developer's proposition, failed. <br /> Mr. Mandavi reiterated that he empathizes with the people in Mission Hills and Ventana <br /> Hills, who got an agreement in 1991 that no roads are going to go through their <br /> community for one simple reason—they did not want it. He noted that their motivation <br /> for being here tonight is a kind of challenge in just trying to convince the Commission <br /> that the staff recommendation is the right one, to say that it is a little thing that can be <br /> tweaked here so the Lund Ranch development road and the traffic would not go through <br /> their neighborhood. He indicated that he understood that, but he thinks it is the wrong <br /> solution. He stated that people need to look at the bigger picture and what the people <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 14 of 35 <br />