Laserfiche WebLink
3. Design and environmental review processes referenced in the proposed chapter <br /> for roads and streets is normally done and does not need to be repeated in the <br /> draft code chapter. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that this is one of the easier issues. He indicated that at first, staff <br /> really thought they should be included in the ordinance, but upon further consideration, <br /> staff noted that these processes still exist and will be implemented, and there is no need <br /> to reference them in the ordinance implementing Measure PP. <br /> 4. Staff should explore providing an inventory of City ridgelines on vacant properties <br /> affected by the proposed chapter. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the Commission asked staff to look into pre-defining the ridges on <br /> vacant properties that would be subject to Measure PP. He indicated that staff had <br /> some substantial discussion on this item, and staff really believes that could be a very <br /> contentious process. He stated that staff prefers to do this on a case-by-case basis with <br /> the individual development applications. He added that staff believes that this <br /> ordinance could be hung up for months figuring out what the ridges would be, <br /> particularly on the Oak Grove property. <br /> Mr. Dolan pointed out to the Commission that staff reviewed the definitions that were <br /> included in the first draft of the ordinance and made some very minor word changes to <br /> its definition of a ridge. He added that it does not necessarily have any substantive <br /> change. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired how the definition of "Ridge and Ridgelines" on page 5 <br /> of the staff memo differs from any definition of"ridge" and "ridgelines" that were in place <br /> in 2008. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the definitions are very close; a few words were taken out relative <br /> to major and minor ridges as the distinction did not seem important in this context. <br /> Chair Blank stated that he has been contacted by a lot of members of the public asking <br /> when rights are vested. He noted that he thinks everyone understands that <br /> Measure PP would override Specific Plans because Specific Plans are a subset of <br /> General Plans. He inquired, from a constructionist's viewpoint, what the impact of this <br /> implementation would be on existing PUDs that are not yet developed or are in various <br /> stages of going through the process. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that there are really only a few ways to truly have a vested right: one <br /> is through a Development Agreement, which basically freezes the approvals that were <br /> in place at the time the Agreement was adopted; and a second way is through an <br /> approved Vesting Tentative Map, such as that which was just approved tonight. He <br /> explained that it is just like a Tentative Map, but it has the added value to the applicant <br /> that it does the same thing as a Development Agreement in terms of freezing the <br /> regulations that were in place at that time and they have those rights. He continued that <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 13, 2013 Page 8 of 35 <br />