My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2013 4:41:37 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 2:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
17
Document Relationships
10
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\040213
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2013\040213
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"18.08.535, Structure." <br /> "'Structure' means anything constructed or erected which requires a <br /> location on the ground, including a building or a swimming pool, but not <br /> including a fence or a wall used as a fence if the height does not exceed six <br /> feet, or access drives or walks." <br /> Staff does not believe that this definition resolves the issue as the exemption from <br /> the definition granted to "access drives" is not clear. It is also not clear that the <br /> proponents of Measure PP or the voters had this particular definition of structures <br /> in mind. Further, staff believes that if the proponents of Measure PP intended the <br /> measure to address roads, they would have simply made the reference to roads <br /> as something prohibited by the measure. <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council <br /> that the references to exemptions for planned roads be removed from the <br /> proposed ordinance, and that roads not be considered structures for the purpose <br /> of implementing Measure PP. <br /> It is important to note that an ordinance, which does not define roads as <br /> structures, would not preclude the City's discretionary review authority whereby <br /> any proposed road could be modified or prohibited if such a roadway was found to <br /> be inconsistent with Policy 21 of the Land Use Element of the Pleasanton General <br /> Plan: <br /> "Policy 21:" <br /> "Preserve scenic hillside and ridge views of the Pleasanton, Main, <br /> and Southeast Hills ridges (Measure QQ, November 2008). <br /> Moreover, a project with a proposed road with ridge or slope impacts would be <br /> subject to CEQA review. <br /> 4. Environmental Review <br /> Planning Commission Comment <br /> The design and environmental review processes referenced in the proposed code <br /> chapter for roads and streets is normally done, and does not need to be repeated <br /> in the ordinance implementing Measure PP. <br /> Staff Response <br /> As stated above, Staff removed Section 18.70.070 F. from the proposed code <br /> chapter. <br /> 5. Predetermined Ridgelines. <br /> Planning Commission Comment <br /> Staff should explore providing an inventory of City ridgelines on vacant properties <br /> affected by the proposed code chapter. <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.