Laserfiche WebLink
some clarifying language and forwarded the proposed General Plan amendments to the ALUC in <br /> December 2012. <br /> Ms. Stern reviewed the areas of the updated ALUCP that pertain to and could potentially affect <br /> Pleasanton. <br /> • Airport Influence Area (AIA) — Defined as an area in which the ALUC finds potential for <br /> overflight, safety or airspace issues that could necessitate restricted land uses. The ALUC is <br /> authorized to review certain land use actions within this area including General Plan <br /> amendments, Specific Plan amendments, rezonings and bulding regulations. The newly <br /> adopted AIA boundary differs slightly from the previous plan, as demonstrated in the staff report. <br /> The East Pleasanton Specific Plan area is contained within the boundaries of the AIA. <br /> • Airport Protection Area (APA) —Added to the ALUCP in 1993, the APA prohibits new residential <br /> land use designations and the intensification of any existing residential development within its <br /> boundaries. The APA is intended to prevent the encroachment of incompatible land uses near <br /> the Livermore Airport. <br /> • Safety Compatibility Zones—The former Airport Safety Zone has been replaced with seven new <br /> Safety Compatibility Zones developed in accordance with the California Airport Land Use <br /> Planning Handbook. Of the seven new zones, Zones 4, 6 and 7 extend into and could have <br /> some impact on Pleasanton. Zone 4, the outer approach or departure zone, allows some retail <br /> and office uses, prohibits children's schools, large daycare centers, hospitals, nursing homes, <br /> hotels, and indoor or outdoor large assemblies. Zone 4 also prohibits uses that might present <br /> bird hazards, which include golf courses, field crops, dry farms and fish and game reserves. <br /> Zone 6, the traffic pattern zone, allows residential, retail and office uses but again prohibits large <br /> assemblies, children's schools, golf course, field crops, dry farms and fish and game reserves. <br /> Zone 7 also allows residential, retail and office uses but prohibits field crops, dry farms and fish <br /> and game reserves. <br /> • Height Referral Area — The Height Referral Area, which is referred to in the current General <br /> Plan, delineates the area in which the ALUC does not wish to see construction projects <br /> exceeding 200 feet in height. Few buidlings exceeding this height restriction exist within <br /> Pleasanton and staff does not feel this should be of great concern to the City. <br /> Councilmember Brown noted the staff report indicates that Zone 4 allows lower density, single and <br /> multiple family residential, as well as retail and office space uses. <br /> Ms. Stern explained that in Pleasanton Zone 4 is also situated entirely within the Airport Protection <br /> Area, which does not allow those uses. The portion of Zone 4 located in Livermore is outside the <br /> protection area and therefore would allow those limited uses. <br /> Councilmember Pentin noted that Zone 7 and perhaps some of Zone 6 cover nearly all of Staples <br /> Ranch. He asked how this affects some of the parks and wildlife areas that are part of the site's Master <br /> Plan. Ms. Stern explained that Staples Ranch has both an approved Master Plan and Vesting Tentative <br /> Map, which qualify as existing uses and cannot be referred back to the ALUCP. <br /> Ms. Stern reviewed the General Plan amendments, which include minor language and diagram <br /> changes to the Public Safety Element's Background Section, as well as acknowledgement of the new <br /> ALUCP in the Safety Element's Goals, Policies and Programs. As already noted, staff believe the plan <br /> is workable with the clarifications outlined in Appendix C. These include a definition of the existing uses <br /> for Staples Ranch and the East Pleasanton Specific Plan area for the purposes of the ALUCP and <br /> acknowledgement that these do not require further review by the ALUC. Staff included an expectation <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 9 February 5,2013 <br />