My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
030513
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:58:08 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 4:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/5/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permitted And Conditionally Permitted Uses <br /> Section 17021.5 requires that any employee housing occupied by six or fewer <br /> employees be deemed a single family structure with a residential land use, and shall be <br /> treated the same as a single family dwelling of the same type in the same zone. To <br /> comply with this section it is recommended that all zones that permit one-family <br /> dwellings be modified to clarify that housing for agricultural employees, as defined by <br /> Sections 17021.5 and 17008, also be permitted. The zoning districts that permit one- <br /> family dwellings are the A Agricultural District, R-1 One-Family Residential Districts, RM <br /> Multi-Family Residential Districts, and H-P-D Hillside Planned Development District. <br /> As indicated above, Section 17021.6 requires employee housing consisting of no more <br /> than 36 beds in a group quarters, or 12 units or spaces designed for use by a single <br /> family or household to be deemed an agricultural land use requiring that it be treated <br /> the same as any other agricultural activity in the same zone. It shall not be considered <br /> an activity that differs from agricultural use. <br /> Currently the Pleasanton zoning regulations both permit and conditionally permit a <br /> variety of agricultural-type uses in the A Agricultural District. For example, orchards and <br /> vineyards are permitted and higher impact uses such as poultry raising, egg processing, <br /> and hatcheries are conditionally permitted. In the R-1 One-Family Residential District <br /> the raising of fruit and nut trees, vegetables and horticultural specialties is a permitted <br /> use, and the raising of rabbits or fowl is conditionally permitted. Since both the A and R- <br /> 1 districts permit some agricultural use by right, Section 17021.6 mandates that <br /> employee housing consisting of up to 36 beds, or 12 units or spaces, be deemed an <br /> agricultural use and therefore be permitted without discretionary approval in both zones. <br /> There is concern that higher impact agricultural activities and the associated employee <br /> housing described under section 17021.6 would not be compatible with residential <br /> neighborhoods in the R-1 zoning district. To prevent potential negative impacts without <br /> prohibiting all agricultural activities, it is recommended that the code distinguish <br /> between the growing of plants and animals for private, noncommercial use (such as a <br /> vegetable garden) and commercial-scale agricultural activities which could implicate the <br /> need for employee housing. Under this proposal, private and noncommercial raising of <br /> plants and animals would be permitted by-right in both the R-1 and A districts. Limited <br /> commercial-scale agricultural uses would be conditionally permitted in R-1 and <br /> permitted in A. Higher impact agriculture activities would continue to require a <br /> conditional use permit in the A district. Employee housing involving more than six <br /> employees, as provided in Section 17021.6, would then require a use permit in the R-1 <br /> district. The proposed distribution of noncommercial growing, commercial-scale <br /> agriculture and employee housing, as permitted or conditionally permitted uses in the A <br /> and R-1 districts, is shown in the table below. The full redlined text amendment is <br /> included as Exhibit A. <br /> Case No. P12-1785 City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 4of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.