My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
030513
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:58:08 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 4:23:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/5/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with the requirements of the Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and <br /> 17021.6 related to farm-worker employee housing. <br /> The amendment to the zoning regulations would result in the following: <br /> • Housing of six or fewer agricultural employees in one dwelling would be <br /> considered a residential use and treated the same as a dwelling unit. <br /> • Housing of up to 36 agricultural employees in group quarters and up to 12 <br /> dwelling units would be considered the same use as commercial agriculture and <br /> permitted in the same way. <br /> Farm-workers are identified in the housing element as a population with special housing <br /> needs. In its evaluation of special needs housing, the housing element background <br /> report published in February, 2012, broadly describes housing issues for agricultural <br /> workers. It indicates that as a group they tend to have lower incomes, poorer health and <br /> live in substandard conditions. Because of the transient and seasonal nature of the work <br /> it is difficult to estimate their numbers. The Association of Bay Area Governments' <br /> Projections 2007 estimated 300 persons employed in agriculture and natural resources <br /> within Pleasanton's sphere of influence in 2005, and forecasted an estimated 310 <br /> persons in 2035. Although this is a relatively small population, in Alameda County there <br /> were about 6,631 harvested acres in 2007. Agricultural enterprises within Pleasanton <br /> are limited, as are the lands designated for agricultural use. However, there is an active <br /> grape-growing region to the southeast of the city. <br /> Sections 17021.5 and 17021.6 of the State Health and Safety Code (attached as Exhibit <br /> B.1 and B.2) are within the part of the code known as the Employee Housing Act. The <br /> act sets standards for the construction, maintenance, use, and occupancy of living <br /> quarters called "employee housing" as defined in Section 17008 of the Health and <br /> Safety Code (attached as Exhibit B.3). Employee housing includes but is not limited to <br /> farm-worker housing. The intent of these two sections is to broaden opportunities for <br /> employee housing, as follows: <br /> Section 17021.5 requires that any employee housing occupied by six or fewer <br /> employees shall be deemed a single family structure with a residential land use, and <br /> shall be treated the same as a single family dwelling of the same type in the same zone. <br /> Occupation of a single family dwelling by six or fewer employees shall not be <br /> considered a change of occupancy for the purpose of building codes. <br /> Section 17021.6 requires that employee housing consisting of no more than 36 beds in <br /> a group quarters, or 12 units or separate rooms or spaces (e.g. cabins without kitchens) <br /> designed for use by a single family or household, be deemed an agricultural land use, <br /> and that it be treated the same as any other agricultural activity in the same zone. This <br /> means that if an agricultural use, such as the raising of crops, is permitted by-right in a <br /> particular zone, then employee housing of no more that 36 beds in a group quarters, or <br /> 12 units, shall also be permitted by-right in that zone. Section 17021.6 also stipulates <br /> that the occupancy of such housing may include employees who do not work on the <br /> property where the employee housing is located. <br /> Case No. P12-1785 City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.