My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN011513
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN011513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2013 3:24:02 PM
Creation date
2/8/2013 3:23:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN011513
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
relief, and they have approached all participating cities to help get them back on their feet. Mr. Fialho <br /> noted the because of their geographic location, the cities of San Ramon and Danville have not <br /> historically received the same level of benefit as Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton and are therefore <br /> not positioned to see the value in making such an accommodation. <br /> TVHOC has submitted a three-pronged funding request, the first of which is a $155,000 loan to bring <br /> them current in meeting financial obligations, including payment of a seller's note, contractors' fees <br /> association with building improvements, property taxes, and fees for the preparation of financial audits. <br /> The loan would be equally split by the three agencies. TVHOC has also requested a $100,000 pledge <br /> to assist with a buy down of their debt and a $270,000 grant to be paid over two years, again shared <br /> equally by the three agencies. <br /> At this stage in the request, the City Managers of each participating city are recommending only to <br /> fund the first leg of the request. If approved, the Council would be authorizing a loan of approximately <br /> $51,500 from the City's Lower Income Housing Reserve, which has approximately $8 million in <br /> unreserved funds. The loan would be unsecured with either a payback period that has yet to be <br /> determined and is supported by the three cities or would be forgiven through some sort of service <br /> offering in the arena of affordable housing. Key features of the loan agreement are as follows: <br /> • Provides that the City Managers of the three cities be added to the TVHOC Board of Directors <br /> to assure overall oversight of TVHOC activities; <br /> • Provides for the cities to monitor programs to ensure that services are core to the mission of the <br /> TVHOC and are prioritized; <br /> • Allows the cities to monitor TVHOC financial resources and other matters, including audits, to <br /> assure appropriate financial planning and accounting; <br /> • Provides parameters for determining the loan repayment plan, including recognition that <br /> repayment is linked to cash flow and therefore may need to be forgiven or offered in another <br /> format; <br /> • Requires TVHOC to provide financial reporting detailing that the loan was used for the intended <br /> purpose of meeting specific outstanding financial obligations <br /> The cities of Livermore and Dublin have already approved the attached agreement, which will be <br /> amended to include Pleasanton if approved by the Council. <br /> Councilmember Pentin asked if this would affect the use of the Lower Income Housing Reserve for <br /> Kottinger Place down the road. <br /> Mr. Fialho said no, reminding him that the $8 million is unencumbered and that $4 million of the $7 <br /> million pledge for the project has already been allocated. <br /> Councilmember Brown asked that the loan total be updated throughout the agreement to reflect <br /> Pleasanton's contribution. <br /> Mayor Thorne acknowledged that TVHOC is much more cost effective than for each Tri-Valley city to <br /> provide the same kind of support but asked Mr. Fialho's candid opinion of whether it could be a <br /> sustainable organization. <br /> Mr. Fialho said he would not be making the recommendation if he did not believe TVHOC could be <br /> fiscally sustainable. He said the real anchor at their feet is the debt related to properties purchased <br /> with good intentions that are no longer in the best interests of the organization. By shedding some of <br /> that debt and focusing on the priorities and missions of TVHOC, he felt the organization could be <br /> sustainable with minimal city support. He did note that Pleasanton does and will continue to provide <br /> support because there are many efficiencies associated with pooling resources in this manner. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 10 of 13 January 15, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.