Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> The City's adopted Climate Action Plan includes a range of energy reducing goals, <br /> including those related to LED retrofit projects. In general LED conversion projects result <br /> in ongoing cost savings that have a positive impact on the City's General Fund in terms <br /> of expenditures, energy savings and reduced maintenance costs. The Bay Area Climate <br /> Collaborative, a group of the region's government, business, and non-profit organizations <br /> that creates common direction and accelerates ideas related to a "clean energy <br /> economy," has monitored the implementation of similar LED retrofit projects and noted <br /> an energy/cost savings of upwards of about 60%. In addition, conversion to LEDs <br /> reduces greenhouse gas emissions considerably and it's estimated that a conversion of <br /> the City's exterior lighting systems would reduce green house gases by approximately <br /> 1,556 metric tons per year. In view of these, savings, it was not a surprise that the <br /> recently completed ESCo audit identified the conversion of exterior lighting as a high <br /> priority/ high results project. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> While the energy savings from LED conversion projects are considerable, they generally <br /> involve a significant up-front capital expenditure to complete. For this project, which <br /> would include all City street lights, park pathway lighting and miscellaneous exterior lights <br /> near public buildings, staff estimates the cost to be approximately $3.2 million. As with <br /> other energy savings projects completed recently, such as the OSC Photo Voltaic (PV) <br /> solar panel installations, staff attempts to leverage various governmental and private <br /> funding sources that minimize the impact on City financial resources. Also, staff has <br /> looked to spread the cost of these projects to a time line that relates to the overall period <br /> of energy savings. As an example, because the proposed LED lighting fixtures have an <br /> expected life span of 20 years, staff has sought funding sources with a pay-back term of <br /> less than this time. <br /> Based on the above, staff has identified two programs meet the financing criteria: <br /> • The California Energy Commission maintains a number of programs funded from <br /> various sources, including the federal government's American Recovery and <br /> Reinvestment Act stimulus funding, which are directed to capital improvements. The <br /> program recommended in this report, provides low interest loans to cities, counties, <br /> special districts, public schools and colleges, public hospitals, public care institutions <br /> to fund energy efficiency improvements related to lighting systems, LED conversions, <br /> pump and motors, building installation and other facility improvements. The interest <br /> rate on these loans is a fixed 1% and term of payment is 15 years. The loan <br /> repayment schedule is tied to the estimated annual energy cost savings from the <br /> aggregate energy project using energy cost schedules and estimates available at the <br /> time. The program is competitive and requires a program application and resolution <br /> from the agencies governing body. Funds are dispersed on a reimbursement basis. A <br /> standard loan agreement provided by the CEC is used for all loans. To date nearly <br /> $300 million has been allocated through this program. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />