My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
011513
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2013 12:14:08 PM
Creation date
1/8/2013 12:13:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> DRAFT <br /> P12-1753, City of Pleasanton <br /> Application to amend Title 18 (Zoning) of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to <br /> modify Chapter 18.08 (Definitions) and to add Chapter 18.105 (Cottage Food <br /> Operations) establishing a permit process and performance standards for home- <br /> based food production and sales in residences. <br /> Natalie Amos presented the staff report and described the scope and key elements of <br /> the proposal. <br /> Acting Chair Blank commented that the new State law is so poorly worded, noting that <br /> food and food products allowed to be produced at cottage food operations include <br /> baked goods without cream ... such as breads. He requested clarification whether <br /> custard or filling is allowed. <br /> Ms. Amos said no. <br /> Acting Chair Blank continued that breads are allowed. <br /> Ms. Amos said yes. She explained that the State defined what food is allowed and that <br /> it is prepared by an enterprise within the registered or permitted space or area of the <br /> home or apartment or multi-family housing where the individual operates. She added <br /> that staff is proposing to add this type of use in the Pleasanton Municipal Code, <br /> including the lists of performance standards in terms of spacing, which would be similar <br /> to large family home daycares where these facilities are to be at least there 300 feet <br /> apart for single-family homes and only one within each building for apartment <br /> complexes. <br /> Ms. Amos stated that the proposed parking requirements include one parking space for <br /> either garage or carport and the driveway, as well as parking for any employees, for <br /> single-family homes, and whatever the designated parking space is for apartment <br /> buildings. She added that on-street parking spaces can be used for deliveries or <br /> pick-up of any cottage food being purchased from the premises, and for those with no <br /> garages, staff is proposing loading hours of 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through <br /> Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on weekends. <br /> Ms. Amos continued that the noise requirement would be consistent with what is <br /> already in place per the Municipal Code. She stated that the size of the facility would be <br /> based on the lesser of two options: 30 percent of the floor area of the dwelling unit <br /> excluding the garage area, or the area permitted by Alameda County Environmental <br /> Health Food and Safety Division. She added that the terms of occupancy would be <br /> what are required by the Building Code, and any internal changes, such as moving <br /> walls, would require a building permit. She indicated that staff is also proposing to <br /> prohibit signage, outdoor sales, and dining at the facility. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/28/2012 Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.