Laserfiche WebLink
To assure that them is adequate funding for the recommended 2004-05 projects, staff will refrain from <br />incurring costs on these projects until after approval of the Mid-Term Budget. Staff will however, <br />continue working on projects which have received partial funding and approvals in previous years. Bv <br />utilizing the above revenue forecasting method, the City avoids revenue shortfalls resulting from less <br />than anticipated development revenue and minimizes the financial impact of future development trends. <br /> <br />Program Organization and Changes <br /> <br />As previous CIP's, this document is arranged by project category (i.e., Streets. Parks, Miscellaneous, <br />Water, Sewer and Unfunded), with project description sheets for multiple year projects appearing only in <br />the year that projects are initially funded. Projects from each of the five funded project categories are <br />found in the sections highlighted by project tabs. Summary financial tables which detail a listing of <br />revenues and project expenditures from each of the project categories of Streets, Parks, Miscellaneous, <br />Water and Sewer for each of the four years are included immediately following this section. Detailed <br />financial tables showing funding sources for all projects are included in Section 1 of the Appendix. <br /> <br />Project identification numbers are included on project description sheets and financial tables. The first <br />two digits of these numbers reflect the fiscal year the project was first funded and the additional digits <br />reflect City account numbers. Page numbers identifying each project are included in the table of <br />contents and on the summary financial tables. <br /> <br />To be consistent with unique project needs and available funding, this CIP contains a number of <br />significant changes from previous CIP's. The major changes are as follows: <br /> <br />The Program has been changed from a five year budget to a four year budget. While a five year <br />CIP is fairly common with cities, the change has been made so that the Program is more <br />consistent with the City's two year operating budget. As a result, the first two years are <br />presented as funded years and the final two years are projections that can be fully incorporated <br />into the planning of the proceeding City budget. In addition to this reason for change, because <br />community needs are quite volatile, the accuracy of forecast for the fifth year has been limited. <br />As a result, the elimination of the final year will not hinder long term planning. <br /> <br />Similar to the 2002-03 Mid-Term CIP, the CIP includes a number of projects funded previously <br />that have been reintroduced in this CIP for additional project funding resulting from changes in <br />the project's scope and/or inflationary costs. Previously, these cost fluctuations were addressed <br />at the time the City Council awarded a contract to proceed with project development. However, <br />due to the scope of changes required and an attempt to have the CIP be as accurate as possible, <br />these projects are being reintroduced. For identification purposes, these projects include <br />"additional funding" in their title. Also included are projects established as reserves in <br />anticipation of additional funding at a later date. A listing of the projects submitted for <br />additional funding and reserve projects is listed below. Note that this list does not include <br />projects with funding planned over multiple years like the "First Street and Kottinger <br />Undergrounding for Streetlights" or the "Relocation of the Railroad Avenue Fire station". <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br /> <br />