My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 03081
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
RES 03081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2003 8:49:16 AM
Creation date
7/7/2003 8:31:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2003
DOCUMENT NO
RES 03081
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
determined rate cycle. Over time, the rates should again normalize, and our total <br />costs will be the same as projected in the long term. The City was faced with a <br />similar situation in the mid 1980s, when PERS rates were 21.5% for public safety <br />and 10.2% for miscellaneous employees. <br /> <br />Unlike Pleasanton, many agencies took advantage of the long period of lower <br />interest rates to balance their budgets, and they are now facing burdensome PERS <br />rate increases. Because Pleasanton assumed the rate reductions were temporary <br />and continued to budget for their costs, these large increases have been somewhat <br />mitigated. Of course the portfolio losses have been large and happened very <br />quickly, but the City's long-term financial planning will continue to normalize or <br />level-off these PERS spikes over the long-term. <br /> <br />e. Medical Premiums <br /> <br />Providing quality, affordable health care for employees has become an almost <br />unbeatable challenge in today's market. The basic problem is the rapidly rising <br />cost of health care, particularly hospital and prescription costs, compounded by <br />the lack of effectiveness of managed care to keep prices in check. <br /> <br />For the fourth year in a row, the City's medical premiums will continue to climb <br />faster than inflation in fiscal year 2003-04. The City's two health carriers have <br />informed the City that they will increase their premiums by approximately 12%, <br />beginning July 1, 2003. As a side note, while these pementages are high, they are <br />actually lower than what staff is seeing industry wide in Northern California. <br /> <br />f. Workers' Compensation <br /> <br />Because the City is self-insured for workers' compensation activities, the City has <br />an established Workers' Compensation Fund to account for and finance its <br />liability arising out of workplace injuries. From this Fund, the City makes <br />payments on all recorded and approved claims. For the period ending 6/30/02, <br />the City's estimated future liability for all prior and current-year claims <br />(excluding LPFD) was $1.6 million. As a comparison, this represents about a <br />$265,000 increase from the period ending 6/30/01. During this same period, the <br />LPFD's estimated future liability for all prior and current-year claims was <br />$1 million - this represents an increase of approximately $386,000 from the <br />previous fiscal year. All total, the City's combined liability for workers' <br />compensation (excluding Livermore's share for LPFD) is approximately <br />$2.1 million. <br /> <br />While staff continues to aggressively manage workers' compensation claims to <br />minimize and control costs to the City, the impacts and realities of workers' <br />compensation laws are not within our span of control. For example, a new bill <br />that was signed into law in 2002 increased temporary disability benefits from the <br />maximum weekly rate of $490 to $602 in 2003, and the amount will <br />incrementally go up again in 2004, 2005 and 2006. An increase in the permanent <br />disability weekly maximum is also included in this new law. A very powerful <br /> <br />xvi <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.