Laserfiche WebLink
The Special Revenue Funds reflect an increase in 2003-04 over 2002-03 of about a <br />half million in the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department (LPFD) Fund, which is <br />offset by a similar decrease in revenue projections for grants and donations. Since <br />there is no certainty of obtaining grants and donations fi.om year to year, staff does <br />not project for those that are unknown. When more information is available about <br />these funding sources, staff will come forward to Council with any recommended <br />uses for these funds. Most of the revenue increase in 2004-05 over 2003-04 is due to <br />LPFD cost increases. <br /> <br />It should be noted that, in the revenue graphs displayed in the Summary Section of <br />the Budget, the Internal Service Funds and LPFD Fund revenues are excluded, <br />because they distort the comparisons. This is the result of reporting, what is in <br />essence, duplicate revenue. For example, the General Fund receives taxes, fees and <br />other revenues. From these revenues it funds operating costs, including "internal" <br />charges. These internal charges then result in revenue being credited to the Intemal <br />Service Funds. Thus the revenue is not new, additional revenue, but only internal <br />revenue. Therefore, internal revenues need to be taken out when comparisons of <br />revenue are made from year to year. <br /> <br />Similarly, Livermore and Pleasanton fund the LPFD Fund. This funding shows as <br />"revenue" in the budget. However, the source of Pleasanton's share is still the taxes, <br />fees and other revenues already accounted for. The revenue in the LPFD Fund from <br />Livermore offsets it share of the expenditures, so there is a net zero effect on <br />Pleasanton's budget, if both revenue and expenditure are netted out. Therefore, the <br />LPFD revenue also has been taken out when doing comparisons. <br /> <br />If we exclude the Internal Service Funds and the LPFD Fund from the table on the <br />prior page, the total revenue increase in 2003-04 over 2002-03 is $3.2 million or <br />3.1%, and the total revenue increase in 2004-05 over 2003-04 is $4.6 million or 4.3%. <br /> <br />Transfers between Funds that represent payment for overhead or reimbursements for <br />services or other costs, are shown as "interfund revenue" to one Fund, offset by <br />"interfund expenditure" to another. These transactions are reflected at the program <br />level rather than just the Fund level, in order to provide better program cost <br />accounting. Interfund revenues for all Operating Budget Funds total $4.25 million in <br />2003-04 and $4.4 million in 2004-05. Interfund expenditures for all Operating <br />Budget Funds total $5.0 million in 2003-04 and $4.0 million in 2004-05. <br /> <br />A detailed discussion of the City's major revenues and the methods used for <br />forecasting them for 2003-04 and 2004-05 is contained in Appendix D. <br /> <br />2. Total Expenditures: All Operating Budget Funds <br /> <br />Recommended Operating Expenditures for all Funds for fiscal year 2003-04 total <br />$135.4 million, or a 4.8% decrease over the fiscal year 2002-03 appropriation of <br />$142.2 million. Recommended expenditures for 2004-05 total $145.0 million, or a <br />7.1% increase over the 2003-04 recommendation. <br /> <br />vi <br /> <br /> <br />