My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112712 Special Meeting
>
01 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/27/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Of the properties subject to the Initiative that can support greater than ten units <br /> under the General Plan, the Yee project and the Maroon Creek project(see <br /> Exhibit C),both west of Foothill Road, are proposing fewer than ten units, which <br /> would exempt these projects from the Initiative. <br /> C. The properties that appear to be impacted are the Lester property(off of Dublin <br /> Canyon Road)and properties in the Southeast Hills- Lund Ranch II property, the <br /> Foley property, potentially the Lin(Oak Grove) property (if that project is <br /> overturned by referendum), and potentially the Spotomo property4 (within the <br /> Happy Valley Specific Plan area). (See Exhibit C.) <br /> Although the number of units on hillside properties would likely be reduced between 119 <br /> and 224 units due to the Initiative(see Table 1),those units will likely be built elsewhere <br /> in Pleasanton. Due to the housing cap,there are only a limited number of units remaining <br /> that can be developed in the City,and developers have expressed interest in building all <br /> of the units that are available under the cap. Furthermore, State law requires that units on <br /> property identified in the Housing Element as developable which do not receive <br /> development entitlements must be transferred elsewhere in the City! Therefore, units <br /> that cannot be developed in hillside areas under the Initiative will be built in other areas <br /> of the City, such as in the Hacienda Business Park, the Downtown, and/or other flat in-fill <br /> sites throughout the City. Although certain property owners would be impacted by this <br /> consequence of the Initiative, the City overall, from a land use perspective, will not be <br /> affected significantly.6 <br /> ' <br /> Regarding the Spotomo property,as currently designated in the Happy Valley Specific Plan,the <br /> Spotomo Upper Valley would be impacted by the Initiative. If,however,Grcenbriar Homes'proposed <br /> General Plan amendment and Specific Plan modification(as to the Spotomo property)are approved, <br /> development would be transferred to the Spotortto Flat,which is land generally having less than 25% <br /> slopes;the question of the application of the Initiative to the Bypass Road is discussed in Sections 4.2 and <br /> 5.7,below. <br /> ' See Government Code 465863. <br /> 6 See Section 4.5 for a discussion about traffic impacts,and Section 7 for fiscal impact'. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.