My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112712 Special Meeting
>
01 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/27/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.2. Fiscal Impact of Including Assisted Living Units in the Housing Cap Count <br /> Impact on a Prospective Basis39 <br /> The Initiative defines a housing unit to include any residences that have a kitchen(sink, <br /> cooking device, and refrigerator) and a bathroom (toilet, tub or shower). The statement <br /> of reasons section of the Initiative states that the Pleasanton definition of housing unit <br /> should be consistent with the U.S. Census Bureau and State of California definitions <br /> when calculating the housing cap. <br /> Staff looked at development planned in the near future that,depending upon this <br /> application of this definition,may trigger this section of the Initiative; the one project <br /> identified is the Continuing Life Care(CLC)project planned for the Staples Ranch <br /> property. CLC proposes to build 636 units that would include independent living units, <br /> villas and apartments. To date,the City Council has indicated that 240 of the 636 units <br /> would count towards the City's housing cap;however a final decision will not be made <br /> on that issue until Council considers the PUD development plan for the CLC facility. In <br /> the meantime, for other purposes, staff has been counting 240 units from CLC towards <br /> the housing cap consistent with the Council's preliminary direction. <br /> If,however,the Initiative were adopted and all 636 units were determined to fall within <br /> the Initiative's definition of a"housing unit" and count toward the City's housing cap, <br /> this would cause a reduction of an additional 396 units(that is, in addition to the 240 staff <br /> has been counting) in the number of future housing units that could be developed in the <br /> City under the housing cap. This would create a loss in annual net revenues to the City, <br /> as well as upfront capital fees(development impact fees), as follows: <br /> Table 9 <br /> Housing Unit Assumptions: <br /> Single Family <br /> Multifamily Uniti't Detached Unit) <br /> Floor Area: 900 square feet 3,500 square feet <br /> Cost per squan foot: $250 $350 <br /> Estimated Market Value: $225,000 $1,225,000 <br /> Person Per Household: 1st 2.0 3.0 <br /> (1) Based on Windstar Apartment Project 350 units ranging from 578 square feet to 1,368 square feet; <br /> of the 350 units 213 units are one bedroom/one bath, 130 are two bedrooms/two baths and 7 are three <br /> bedrooms/three baths. <br /> (2) Based on the Ironwood Project 191 units ranging from 1,450 square feet to 5,091 square feet. <br /> (3) Per State of California Department of Finance as of January 1, 2008: 2.753 persons per household in <br /> Pleasanton. Per U.S. Census: owner occupied 2.87 persons per household and renter occupied 2.3 <br /> persons per household. <br /> Per 1998 General Plan: 3.09 persons per single family household and 2.05 persons per multifamily <br /> household. <br /> " The analysis only considers the application of the definition of housing unit on a prospective basis <br /> because the Initiative did not include specific language about retroactivity. <br /> 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.