My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112712 Special Meeting
>
01 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 4:42:30 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 4:42:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/27/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Additional Questions from Council and the Public <br /> 5.1. Which properties would be subject to the Initiative; if new hillside <br /> regulations were adopted,to which properties would they apply? <br /> The Initiative does not limit the areas of the City to which it would apply rem <br /> the Initiative's Policy 12.3 would generally apply to those properties wi 100 cal <br /> feet of the ridgeline, as well as those properties with hillside slopes of 25%o r greater. <br /> (See Table 1 and Exhibit C.) In certain areas of the City,however(for example <br /> properties west of Foothill Road and on certain properties within the Vineyard Avenue <br /> Corridor Specific Plan),there already exist hillside regulations and standards. This <br /> Policy 12.3 therefore would be in addition to those regulations and standards and, as a <br /> general principle, the more restrictive provisions would apply. <br /> Notwithstanding that the Initiative has city wide application, the Initiative does include <br /> language e <br /> language exempting housing developments of 10 or fewer units on property ihat <br /> January 1,2007 was a"legal parcel". <br /> As to that portion of Policy 12.3 that addresses subdividing legal parcels, plyin hying d <br /> methods of statutory construction and interpretation, it would apply <br /> properties with greater than 25% slope or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline. A more <br /> expansive(but more strained) reading of the restriction against splitting a legal parcel to <br /> approve more than 10 housing units, however,could result in the application of the <br /> r <br /> restriction City-wide. (See Section 5.16.) <br /> The Initiative's Policy 15.3, defining housing unit, does clearly have City-wide <br /> application. <br /> If the Initiative were adopted and,subsequently,new hillside regulations promulgated <br /> consistent with the Initiative, it would need to be determined which properties would be <br /> subject to such new regulations. That is,since the proposed Initiative does not specify or <br /> limit the hillside areas where it applies,consideration is needed whether certain areas that <br /> are already covered by hillside regulations or policies should be exempt from additional <br /> new hillside regulations. <br /> It would need to be determined whether any new hillside regulations should ouldlacply <br /> equally to the entire City. This could be perceived <br /> manner in which to create and implement hill area development regulations. pelicies and <br /> regulations based on the Initiative could be developed to supplement <br /> ordinances, as well as to clarify portions of the Initiative. Opportunities for clarification <br /> could be addressed through development and implementation of appropriate regulations <br /> if the Initiative is adopted. <br /> n For example,the hill area west of Foothill Road is covered by the West Foothill Road Corridor dor Overlay <br /> Avenue and by the p General Specific Plan area designated implementing Measure Residential District have special hillside <br /> Avenue Corridor Specilu�Plan ignated <br /> development standards guidelines. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.