My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
112012
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2012 12:47:31 PM
Creation date
11/16/2012 12:47:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br /> Chapter 17.36 <br /> GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM* <br /> Sections: <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> 17.36.020 Objectives. <br /> 17.36.030 Building permit restriction. <br /> 17.36.040 Exemptions. <br /> 17.36.050 Administration of the growth management program. <br /> 17.36.060 Establishment of annual new residential unit limits. <br /> 17.36.070 Apportionment of yearly total new residential units to categories of projects. <br /> 17.36.080 Approval procedures. <br /> 17.36.090 Use and loss of growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.100 Modification to projects with growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.110 Fees and exactions. <br /> 17.36.120 Application to prior approved projects. <br /> * Prior ordinance history:Ords. 1614, 1567, 1545, 1538, 1505, 1466, 1413, 1403, 1378, 1366, 1336 1999 <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> A. Since the mid-1960s, Pleasanton's transformation from a small, agricultural-based community to a suburban <br /> bedroom community and then to a suburban "edge city" has been marked by periods of rapid growth which <br /> stressed the city's ability to provide infrastructure and services, affecting the quality of life of both existing <br /> and new residents. <br /> B. In order to minimize the adverse effects of rapid uncontrolled residential growth, the city council adopted its <br /> first growth management ordinance in 1978, designed to regulate the location and rate of new residential <br /> growth in a period of sewage treatment capacity constraints brought about by air quality degradation concerns. <br /> Through the 1980s and 1990s, the city council modified the growth management ordinance in order to better <br /> achieve the evolving goals set for it, with the rate, location, and type of residential units regulated to achieve <br /> the general welfare of the city. <br /> C. In 1996, the city council adopted a comprehensive revision to its general plan. Key goals and policies reflect <br /> the city's continued commitment to developing in an efficient, orderly, and logical fashion, ensuring adequate <br /> infrastructure and services are present to ensure that the city's quality of life and level of services are <br /> maintained. The general plan calls for assuring its citizens of a predictable growth rate, while providing <br /> housing to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community, regional housing needs, and <br /> employment growth. <br /> D. Despite the controls established by past versions of the city's growth management program, residential <br /> development has continued to fluctuate over time, there has been little predictability of the actual number of <br /> new building permits issued and development under construction, and there is uncertainty over the city's <br /> ability to maintain its service levels and quality of life for its citizens due to regional in luences and uncertain <br /> revenue sources for city and other local service-providing agencies. <br /> E. This revised growth management program has been designed to rectify the areas wherei i the former programs <br /> did not totally succeed; to establish a predictable growth rate which reflects community sentiment and which <br /> alleviates the potential for strain on the ability of the city and other local service providers to keep pace with <br /> services with no reduction in their quality; to continue to relate new residential growth to housing needs <br /> (including regional needs and local employment growth) and the availability of infrastructure and services; to <br /> move toward build-out of the community in a logical manner while affording future development areas the <br /> ability to accommodate changing housing demands; and to be fair and equitable to the development <br /> community, developers large and small, who have either received past approvals under former growth <br /> management programs or who have undertaken or will undertake development plans consistent with current <br /> goals and policies.(Ord. 1729 §2, 1997) <br /> Page 1 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.