Laserfiche WebLink
affordable housing through new development. The IZO requires that any new single-family <br /> residential development of 15 units or more must provide at least 20% of its units at a below- <br /> market sales price (or at least 15% of the total units for multi-family developments). Developers <br /> must seek the approval of the City Council in order to utilize an alternative, such as payment of a <br /> fee in lieu of constructing the affordable housing. <br /> In 1994, the California Coalition for Rural Housing (CCRH) conducted the first statewide survey <br /> on inclusionary housing and found that 12% of statewide jurisdictions had an inclusionary <br /> program. In 2003, CCRH and Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California (NPH) <br /> collaboratively conducted a follow-up survey, which revealed that the number of jurisdictions with <br /> inclusionary housing had jumped to 20%. The 2003 survey generated interest in obtaining more <br /> precise production data on the types of housing built and the income levels served. In 2006, a <br /> new study was launched to determine the growth in inclusionary programs statewide, and provide <br /> a detailed snapshot of the housing that is being produced by these programs. Affordable Housing <br /> by Choice—Trends in California Inclusionary Programs (NPH, 2007) is the most recent survey <br /> of inclusionary ordinances statewide. The study looked at housing produced through inclusionary <br /> programs from January 1999 through June 2006 and found that: <br /> (1) Nearly one-third of California jurisdictions now have Inclusionary Programs. <br /> (2) More than 80,000 Californians have housing through Inclusionary Programs. <br /> (3) Most Inclusionary housing is integrated within market-rate developments. <br /> (4) Inclusionary housing provides shelter for those most in need—nearly three-quarters of <br /> the housing produced through Inclusionary Programs is affordable to people with some of <br /> the lowest incomes. These findings shed new light on the popular perception that <br /> inclusionary policies create ownership units mostly for moderate-income families. <br /> (5) Lower-Income Households are best served through partnerships—When market-rate <br /> developers work with affordable housing developers to meet their inclusionary <br /> requirement, the units are more likely to serve lower-income households. Joint ventures <br /> play a particularly important role in developing units for households most ii need. One- <br /> third of all the housing built through Inclusionary Programs resulted from such <br /> partnerships. <br /> City of Pleasanton Housing Element BACKGROUND—February 2012 102 <br />