12 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Additional information regarding development fees and fees as a proportion of development costs and sales prices. At the request of HCD fees were calculated for a typical single family home and for a multifamily unit. The development fees used are those adopted by the City Council in the Master Fee schedule. • Additional information regarding development review procedures. This section describes the PUD development review process and how it is applied to the recently rezoned multifamily housing sites. • Analysis of building activity and the cost of housing before and after the adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance and the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. Additional information is provided from the Growth Management Ordinance (from PMC Chapter 17.36) and data was collected and shown on p. 100 regarding Pleasanton's growth rate compared to Alameda County's growth rate. Similarly, additional information regarding the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (PMC Chapter 17.44) is provided along with data regarding median home sales prices for both Pleasanton and Alameda County. All other goals, policies and programs and other Background material in the Housing Element adopted February 13, 2012 and amended June 5, 2012 remain the same. CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The proposed amendments to the Housing Element and any subsequent housing development approved by the City Council are required to be consistent with the General Plan as a whole. The General Plan includes a number of performance standards and other requirements to ensure that Pleasanton's quality of life and environment are not adversely affected by future development. Following are a selection of these policies and programs: Circulation Element Policy 2: Phase development and roadway improvements to that levels of service at adjacent major intersections do not exceed LOS D at major intersections outside Downtown and gateway intersections, except as noted below. Program 2.2: Require site-specific traffic studies for all major developments which have the potential to cause the level of service at one or more major intersections to exceed LOS D, and require developers to implement the mitigation measures identified in these studies. In general, require development to improve congested intersections adjacent to such development or pay its pro-rata share of the cost of such improvements, and to pay traffic development fees for use in mitigating traffic impacts in other areas of the city. Program 2.7: Require feasible mitigation measures to keep intersections impacted by development to acceptable service levels, in the event that LOS D is exceeded. If there are no feasible mitigation measures and if the intersections are otherwise not exempt from the LOS D standard, withhold development approvals, including building permits, until the intersections exceeding LOS D are at an acceptable level of service. Page 3 of 6