My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
101612
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 11:59:59 AM
Creation date
10/10/2012 2:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As shown in the table below, the total amount of housing in Pleasanton has risen approximately <br /> 20 percent since the adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance in 1996. During the same <br /> period, housing growth in the remainder of Alameda County has grown only 12 percent. These <br /> figures suggest that adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance has not had a significant <br /> impact on housing production in Pleasanton relative to housing production in Alan'eda County. <br /> Pleasanton's ALA Co ALA Co s <br /> Year PLEASANTON Yr to Yr (not including Yr to Yr incr?ase as% <br /> increase as% Pleasanton) not includin• Pleasanton) <br /> 1990 19,361 484 748 <br /> 1991 19 891 3% 487 819 1% <br /> 1992 20,145 1% 487 791 0°6 <br /> 1993 20431 1% 490157 0°G. <br /> 1994 20 850 2% 492 737 1% <br /> 1995 21,287 2% 494 967 0°% <br /> 1996 21 727 2% 498,042 1%. Mgmt <br /> 1997 22 238 2% 500 710 1% <br /> 1998 22,873 3% 504 666 1% <br /> 1999 23,358 2% 510 203 1% <br /> 2000 23 968 3% 51215 1%! ICZO Started <br /> 2001 24,350 2% 510449 1% <br /> 2002 24,517 1% 522693 1% <br /> 2003 24 860 1% 526 213 1% <br /> 2004 25,042 1% 526 983 1% <br /> 2005 25.253 1% 532 852 1% <br /> 2006 25 470 1% 536 282 --1% <br /> 2007 25 682 2009 _ 25,938 014% 546173 014% <br /> 2008 25,837 1 /° 543 833 1% <br /> _ <br /> 2010 26 053 0.4% 555 319 2%,. <br /> 2011 26069 _-- 0.1% 556658 0_2% <br /> 2012 26 132 0.2% 557 917 02/0 <br /> % Increase 20% 12% <br /> from 1996 <br /> % Increase 9% 8% <br /> from 2000 — <br /> ICZO Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance <br /> To the extent that growth management had any impact on housing costs or quantity of production <br /> of housing in Pleasanton, it will not affect either of those issues for the duration of the current <br /> planning period. Because the housing units proposed during the current planning period are well <br /> short of the overall 3,299 RHNA allocation, the Growth Management Ordinance has no bearing <br /> on the number of units that can be approved until the 3,299 units assigned to the City have been <br /> achieved. Based on current market conditions and anticipated property owner interest in <br /> development, the City will not receive applications for even 50 percent of the RHNA target, and <br /> therefore, no limitation on development will be applied. <br /> City of Pleasanton Housing Element BACKGROUND—February 2012 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.