My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
101612
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2012 2:23:16 PM
Creation date
10/10/2012 2:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
might be different from the State's guidelines. If the ultimate product were not agreeable to the <br /> City, there are provisions allowing a member to opt-out. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked if there exists the capacity or ability to handle the organic <br /> waste collected as part of phase two, assuming each agency were to opt-in. <br /> Mr. Bocian said that they have been working to secure an appropriate site to process the waste <br /> but is not clear on whether anything has been resolved. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan noted that he serves on the board of Stopwaste.org and said that one <br /> of the highest priorities in the county is to secure an in-county organics processing site. <br /> Gary Wolf, Stopwaste.org, said he is very pleased with the staff recommendation and would <br /> welcome Pleasanton to join the other fourteen member agency partners in this ordinance. With <br /> respect to comments and questions regarding self-haulers, he explained that the ordinance <br /> requires them to either separate the listed covered materials, which are high-value recyclables, <br /> when delivering to the transfer station, utilize a transfer station that has the capacity to sort itself <br /> at no additional charge, or to pay a 10% penalty to send those materials to the landfill. He <br /> stressed that it is simply a discouragement to the burying of high value materials, but that it is <br /> very much an "or" requirement. <br /> With respect to Stopwaste.org's ability to change the ordinance in the future, he explained that <br /> the ordinance does contain a dispute resolution clause that would first require a member agency <br /> to sit down with Stopwaste.org and work to reach a resolution. Following that, any member has <br /> the ability to back out with thirty days notice. He also noted that the ordinance took over a year <br /> and considerable environmental work to develop and that no changes would be simple or likely <br /> to occur in the near future. <br /> Councilmember McGovern requested clarification on the benchmark fee. <br /> Mr. Wolf explained that a survey of 900 single-family carts in the last fiscal year revealed that <br /> 40% of what residents are placing into their refuse carts could have been eliminated through <br /> recycling or compost programs. The benchmark fee, which is between $1.81 and $21.72 <br /> annually depending on the amount of waste produced, allows Stopwaste.org to measure, year <br /> by year and community by community, how their progress compares to the goal of 10% waste <br /> by 2020. He stated that the fee does not have a sunset date but does contain a mechanism for <br /> ending if the governing board decides it is no longer need. He explained that if in any year they <br /> spend less than the revenue generated by the fee, the savings would be used to reduce the fee <br /> the following year. <br /> Councilmember McGovern repeated her question regarding an organics site. <br /> Mr. Wolf stated that Waste Management does have a location at Altamont Landfill and has <br /> applied for permits, which if approved would be the county's first composting facility. Several <br /> other companies are also interested in opening facilities in the county, with particular interest in <br /> the newer completely enclosed facilities that allow both energy capture (valued at around $50 <br /> per ton) and the production of soil amendments. <br /> Councilmember McGovern reported that through her work on the Community Monitoring <br /> Committee for the landfill she learned that they are interested in operating a composting facility <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 12 October 2, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.