My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
100212
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2012 12:49:38 PM
Creation date
9/27/2012 4:42:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As shown in the table below, the total amount of housing in Pleasanton has risen approximately <br /> 20 percent since the adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance in 1996. Durirq the same <br /> period, housing growth in the remainder of Alameda County has grown only 12 percent. These <br /> figures suggest that adoption of the Growth Management Ordinance has not had a significant <br /> impact on housing production in Pleasanton relative to housing production in Alameda County. <br /> Pleasanton's ALA Co ALA Co's <br /> Year PLEASANTON Yr to Yr (not including Yr to Yr increase as <br /> increase as% Pleasanton) not including Pleasanton) <br /> 1990 19361 482 748 <br /> 1991 19 891 3% 487.819 1% <br /> 1992 20,145 1% 487 791 0% <br /> 1993 20,431 1% 490,157 0°/s <br /> 1994 20,850 2% 492,787 1% <br /> 1995 21287 2% 492 967 0% <br /> 1996 21,727 2% 4942 1% Growth Ma <br /> 1997 22,238 2% 500,710 1% <br /> 1998 22 873 3% 502 666 1% <br /> 1999 23358 2% 510.203 1% <br /> 2000 23,968 3% 516 215 1% ICZO Started <br /> 2001 24350 2% 519,449 1% <br /> 2002 24517 1% 522693 1% <br /> 2003 24,860 1% 526,213 1% <br /> 2004 25,042 1% 528,983 1% <br /> 2005 25 253 1% 532 852 1% <br /> 2006 25,470 1% 536,282 1% <br /> 2007 25682 1% 530476 1% <br /> 2008 25 837 1% 543.833 1% <br /> 2009 25 938 0.4% 546 173 0.4% <br /> 2010 26 053 OA% 555 319 2% <br /> 2011 26 069 0i% 556658 0,2% <br /> 2012 26132 02% 557 917 0.2% <br /> % Increase 20% 12% <br /> from 1996 <br /> % Increase 9% 8% <br /> from 2000 <br /> ICZO Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance <br /> To the extent that growth management had any impact on housing costs or quantity of production <br /> of housing in Pleasanton, it will not affect either of those issues for the duration of the current <br /> planning period. Because the housing units proposed during the current planning period are well <br /> short of the overall 3,299 RHNA allocation, the Growth Management Ordinance has no bearing <br /> on the number of units that can be approved until the 3,299 units assiqned to the City have been <br /> achieved. Based on current market conditions and anticipated property owner interest in <br /> development, the City will not receive applications for even 50 percent of the RHNA target, and, <br /> therefore, no limitation on development will be applied. <br /> City of Pleasanton Housing Element BACKGROUND—February 2012 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.