My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
071712 Special Meeting
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 1:51:02 PM
Creation date
7/12/2012 11:45:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember McGovern also expressed concern that the Hacienda guidelines apply to all sites, <br /> rather than just 7, 8, and 9 as she had believed. <br /> Mr. Fialho explained that at the time staff made that statement, the City was not in discussions with <br /> Urban Habitat or the State of California regarding approval of comprehensive guidelines. Mr. Dolan <br /> acknowledged that these guidelines are a bit different and stated that staff has tried to adjust them <br /> whenever a site merits. <br /> Councilmember McGovern said she would prefer a maximum stated density of 30 units per acre, with <br /> the ability to adjust this based on individual development plans. <br /> Mr. Dolan outlined the subsequent process, which would include returning to the Commission on June <br /> 27th with amendments, before returning to the City Council on July 17th <br /> Councilmember Thorne asked if staff had an opportunity to review and incorporate all of the written <br /> suggestions that were submitted. Mr. Dolan said staff has reviewed them, most of which were <br /> submitted by developers of the properties in question. Some changes staff found to be universal, while <br /> others would be more appropriately evaluated as exceptions to standardized guidelines. <br /> Chair Pentin asked if staff intended to amend the reference to a 10 to 15 story hotel tower before this <br /> item comes back in later this month. Mr. Dolan attempted to clarify the matter and explained that there <br /> was previous dialogue from the City about the potential to work with an upscale hotel developer and <br /> really create a centerpiece for this end of town. Mr. Williams did a good job of capturing the idea, <br /> though perhaps it could have been presented more as an option than a recommendation. This <br /> particular location is likely one of few that would be appropriate for a taller building and staff felt the <br /> community could ultimately accept something as tall as the buildings adjacent to it. The Council and <br /> staff also talked a lot about providing a buffer for the BRE site, which larger buildings such as this would <br /> do. <br /> Councilmember McGovern reiterated her discomfort with supporting such a change without the public <br /> weighing in. <br /> Mayor Hosterman said she could likely support whatever structure fits within the limitations established <br /> by the guidelines. <br /> Chair Pentin repeated his earlier reference to contradictory densities. <br /> Mr. Dolan spoke to both this and Councilmember McGovern's earlier comment about setting a <br /> maximum density of 30 units per acre. He explained that the City made certain assumptions within the <br /> Housing Element about the densities that would be allowed by these guidelines, and was very <br /> conservative in presenting that number at 30 units per acre. If the guidelines actually allow a greater <br /> density, this can be a valuable tool during the next cycle of housing assignments. He also explained <br /> that the reality of the BART site is such that it will require structured parking, regardless of the <br /> development. Structured parking is costly and not something that can be supported by 30 units per <br /> acre, unless combined with a hotel or other more dense development. He cautioned the Council that 30 <br /> units per acre on the BART site is an unrealistic expectation. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio concurred that this represents a tremendous change, but so has the entire <br /> process. She said she strongly favored retaining flexibility and cautioned against boxing a future <br /> Council in so that it cannot make the kind of decisions it needs to make in 10 to 15 years when the sites <br /> are developed. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 11 June 5, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.