My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
071712 Special Meeting
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2012 1:51:02 PM
Creation date
7/12/2012 11:45:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember McGovern did not recall approving a density of 75 units per acre for the BART site, <br /> said she was under the impression that the Council had approved a maximum of 30 units per acre, and <br /> doubted the public was aware of this potential density. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that 30 units per acre is the approved minimum density, but there is the potential <br /> for more based on development type and configuration. He stressed that the guidelines do not allow for <br /> the approval of any development that would generate more trips than were assumed in the related <br /> environmental analysis. <br /> Councilmember Thorne presumed, and Mr. Dolan confirmed, that the Planning Commission and <br /> Council would retain certain flexibility in interpreting the standards and guidelines, particularly in <br /> granting exceptions. <br /> Mr. Williams reviewed a variety of development and building types that could be incorporated into any <br /> of the various projects, noting that many of the sites are large enough to accommodate more than one <br /> type and density. He presented several slides outlining the overriding principles of the actual design <br /> guidelines and reiterated that these are intended to serve as a tool in reviewing proposals through the <br /> PUD process, and do not change or detract from the PUD process in any way. <br /> He reviewed the BART document in slightly greater detail and explained that significant emphasis was <br /> placed on interfacing the standards and guidelines for this site with the greater priorities of the original <br /> Hacienda standards and guidelines. He provided several site renderings that outlined circulation, <br /> parking, development pads, and connection with Iron Horse Trail and existing transit networks. <br /> Chair Pentin requested clarification on how Iron Horse Trail intersects with the actual station and what <br /> that means for cyclists. Mr. Williams explained that BART's expectation is that cyclists would dismount <br /> and either walk their bikes to the racks inside the station or continue through the station to the other <br /> side of Iron Horse Trail. <br /> Mr. Dolan acknowledged this is a particular issue for certain members of the Commission and Council. <br /> He assured them that staff raised the issue at every meeting with BART but was unable to reach any <br /> agreement. <br /> Chair Pentin remarked that this would be the only place, along the thirty-mile stretch that is Iron Horse <br /> Trail, where cyclists would be expected to walk their bikes 200 to 300 yards. <br /> The majority of the Council and Commission agreed that this is unacceptable and directed staff to <br /> continue negotiating the matter with BART. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan questioned the proposed two-way loop road design, which he thought could <br /> become a bit too hectic. <br /> Mr. Williams felt a two-way design, with a more traditional intersection, would be preferable than the <br /> current design both in terms of safety and access. <br /> Councilmember McGovern expressed concern over the potential congestion created by the circulation <br /> design and what it would mean to the existing level of service. <br /> Mr. Dolan said traffic, although not in this exact configuration, was examined in the environmental work <br /> for the Hacienda guidelines. He noted that BART operations are not expected to increase significantly <br /> and therefore the bulk of the study related only to additional development. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 11 June 5,2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.