|
A comparison of beginning fund balances is detailed below.
<br /> TABLE Ill
<br /> Comparison of 2012/13 Beginning Fund Balances
<br /> CATEGORY Projections in Mid-Term CIP Difference %Difference
<br /> Current CIP _
<br /> STREETS $3,396,334 $7,358,058 $3,961,724 116.6%
<br /> PARKS 0 443,672 443,672 N/A
<br /> MISCELLANEOUS 549,886 5,688,643 5,138,757 934.5%
<br /> WATER 7,953,938 10,035,651 2,081,713 26.2%
<br /> SEWER 3,870,972 5,274,741 1,403,769 36.3%
<br /> TOTAL $15,771,130 $28,800,765 $13,029,635 82.6%
<br /> In addition to changes in the projected and actual beginning fund balances,
<br /> development fee revenue for calendar year 2011, which is allocated to 2012/13 also
<br /> increased. A summary of the projected versus actual development fees is as follows:
<br /> TABLE IV
<br /> Comparison of Calendar Year 2011 Development Fee Revenue
<br /> FEE TYPE Projections in Mid-Term CIP Difference
<br /> Current CIP Difference
<br /> TRAFFIC IMPACT $170,196 $580,991 $410,795 241.4%
<br /> IN-LIEU PARK DEDICATION 281,503 327,415 45,912 16.3%
<br /> PUBLIC FACILITIES 171,015 277,783 106,768 62.4%
<br /> UTILITY CONNECTION 66,300 262,084 195,784 295.3%
<br /> TRI-VALLEY
<br /> TRANSPORTATION 17,620 85,424 67,804 384.8%
<br /> DOUGHERTY VALLEY
<br /> MITIGATION 50,000 58,800 8,800 17.6%
<br /> TOTAL $756,634 $1,592,497 $835,863 110.5%
<br /> 45
<br />
|