14 ATTACHMENTS 03-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

out that if the City is going to have density above what it normally has, this would be the site to have it. Commissioner Pearce stated she was simply curious as to how they arrived at the number. She indicated that she toured Pleasant Hill as part of the Hacienda Task Force and inquired what its density is. Chair Narum replied that she believed it was 55 dwelling units to an acre. Mr. Williams stated that depending on how it is calculated, portions of it are 55 dwelling units per acre, and other portions are up to 80 dwelling units per acre. He added that in South San Francisco, there is a seven-acre site, with structures no taller than three stories, that has achieved 50 dwelling units per acre. He noted that Pleasanton can get the 75 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of four to five stories in different portions of the site. He further noted that those buildings would still be in scale of the other buildings within the Hacienda Business Park and still not come close to the 85-foot height limit of the other office buildings there. Commissioner Blank stated that a lot of people have approached him about density, and he commented that he thinks that care should be taken in terms of the guidelines as it is so early on in the project, and the City wants to encourage interest in the site as development. Mr. Dolan stated that 85 feet tall residential building sounds scary, but he noted that as presented earlier, densities can be approached in much lower heights. He stated that if the Commission wants to remove some of the fear factor from the community, the Commission can go down this line when it comes time to refine these things. Mr. Fleissig stated that with respect to cost implication, if the developer constructs at 65 feet, which is the type of construction seen throughout the Bay Area, and the developer wanted to add two or three more levels, it would become a different type of construction which is much more costly. He indicated that he is not conceding that this is the normal prototype that would likely be built, but he would like to see what would happen with structured parking that was built as part of this shared parking idea. He added that maybe because this has been so successful and there are people who want to work and live in proximity, and people would like to get up and see some gorgeous views there, that maybe the numbers will change on construction. He stated that they would like to leave appropriately where the structure is located, so that the notion of how this would all work is someone who for some reason wanted it to be 85 feet high in a specific area or to emphasize a certain corner to have a little bit more height is given the opportunity to sculpt it. Commissioner Blank stated that he thinks perhaps the City might want to engage in an educational or outreach process with the community. He noted that there are many third rails in Pleasanton politics, and height is one of them. He added that if folks understand what the City is dealing with and why it is the way it is, the electricity in that third rail would diminish significantly. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, MAY 25, 2011 Page 11 of 18