16 - Laserfiche WebLink

RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft resolution denying the appeal, thereby upholding the Planning Commission's approval of Case No. P11-0731, subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1 (Draft City Council Resolution). FINANCIAL STATEMENT The construction of the fence has no significant fiscal impact on the City. BACKGROUND The subject sites, 3647 and 3633 Glacier Court North, are adjoining properties located on the east site of the street. The properties have a minor down slope from the rear to the front and are a rectangular shape. Mr. Baker's residence at 3647 Glacier Court North is a one-story home with a pool in the rear yard. Mr. Pretzel's residence is a two- story home. The subject fence was constructed prior to city approval. Section 18.84.090.G.of the Pleasanton Municipal Code requires fences greater than six feet but not over eight feet in height be approved by the Zoning Administrator. As a result of code enforcement action, Mr. Robert Baker and Mr. Carl Pretzel, co-owners of the fence, filed a joint application for Administrative Design Review approval for the subject overheight fence on August 31, 2011 (Attachment 3). After the City circulated the notice to inform the adjacent neighbors of the application, a request for a Zoning Administrator hearing was made by Todd Deike. Prior to the hearing, Mr. Pretzel notified staff that he was withdrawing his name as the co-applicant of the overheight fence. r 1 I The Subject Mr. Pretzels :_ 4 Fence Residence '-1I • Mr. Baker's �� ' '� �W itoo...,:. __.--=_ 4116.1„..--.7 '''' dam, _ --..r.--1,41/4„,-4%C. Residence i •r Y ._ . . lis• ., .._ 11.. , 1 . , v.. i ms, tf- i t. nE _._,.. : :A .. : _ 1_ .., - 1..11 ,; il _... !,.1 . ,....is-, _,, _ _ _ . ........1.__ __ _ , e . 0: , ' r Page 2 of 7