My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
051512
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2012 11:28:51 AM
Creation date
5/10/2012 3:43:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 4 <br /> THE CITY OF <br /> . .r. <br /> pLEASANTONC <br /> October 27, 2011 <br /> Robert Baker <br /> 3647 Glacier Court, North <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94588 <br /> Dear Mr. Baker: <br /> P11-0731, Application for administrative design review approval to construct an approximately <br /> 74-foot long redwood fence between 3647 and 3633 Glacier Court North, varying in <br /> height from 72 inches to 83 inches <br /> Effective Date: November 10,2011 <br /> At the Zoning Administrator hearing of October 25, 2011, Case P11-0731 was approved. Approval for the <br /> above-mentioned application was granted subject to the conditions as shown below. <br /> Prior to granting of a permit for an overheight fence, the following three findings must be made: <br /> 1. The application conforms to the objectives of the Pleasanton Zoning Ordinance. <br /> The proposed fencing meets all of the necessary yard requirements as outlined in the <br /> Pieasanton Zoning Ordinance. The fencing is providing a pool barrier for the existing pool on- <br /> site. In addition, the fencing will not detrimentally affect the public health, safety, peace, <br /> comfort, or general welfare. Therefore,the Zoning Administrator can make this finding. <br /> 2. The application assists in providing privacy, in attenuating sound transmission, and/or in <br /> reducing other annoyance from neighboring properties. <br /> The proposed fencing will provide additional privacy, pool safety, and noise attenuation for the <br /> applicant Therefore, the Zoning Administrator can make the second finding. <br /> 3. The application does not significantly impact upon the aesthetics and safety of the <br /> neighborhood nor the light and air to all affected properties. <br /> The proposed fencing is consistent with other existing fencing found within the neighborhood. <br /> The neighborhood does riot have or approved fencing plan for the deiie!opmarit. The <br /> neighboring properties have a variety of fencing types. heights. and colors. <br /> The code allows up to an eight foot tal! fencing to he constructed with City approval. 1 he total <br /> height of the fencing does not exceed seven feet, 1-inch. which allows the passage of light and <br /> air to the neighboring lots while still providing privacy for the parcels. The Zoning Administrator <br /> can find that the design of the fencing is acceptable. In addition, the Zoning Administrator can <br /> find that the fencing does not detrimentally affect the light and air of the neighboring properties, <br /> nor creates a traffic sight obstruction. Therefore. the Zoning Administrator determined that the <br /> third finding can be made, as conditioned below. <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P. 0..BOX 520, Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 <br /> Planning Building& Safety Engineering Traffic Inspection <br /> 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 200 Old Bernal Ave. 157 Main Street <br /> (925)931-5600 (925) 931-5300 (925)931-5650 (925)931-5650 (925)931-5680 <br /> Fax: 931-5483 Fax: 931-5478 Fax: 931-5479 Fax: 931-5479 Fax: 931-5484 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.