My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
050112
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2012 12:58:29 PM
Creation date
4/26/2012 12:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART/V. MOMTOR/NG STANDARDS AND <br /> PROCEDURES <br /> The City of Pleasanton conducts regular monitoring of subrecipients that receive federal funds. <br /> The City's monitoring plan begins with the execution of City/Subrecipient contracts and the <br /> filing of required environmental documentation for subrecipients which were allocated funding <br /> through the public participation process. Once these documents are in place, the City notifies <br /> subrecipients of funding availability effective the beginning of the fiscal year. Subrecipients that <br /> will hire a contractor are advised regarding required documents and procedures. During the <br /> course of the fiscal year, the City receives invoices for program-related expenses and arranges <br /> for payment. All transactions are entered into a Microsoft Access database developed by City <br /> staff. The database provides an extensive history of activity for the City's CDBG program <br /> dating back nearly 25 years. The database also provides a means for tracking the status of any <br /> fixed assets that are purchased with federal funds. <br /> City staff conducts an annual monitoring visit which generally occurs in the last quarter of the <br /> fiscal year or, for major capital improvement projects, upon project completion. Visits are <br /> typically conducted at the site of the project or in the administrative office of the subrecipient. <br /> Prior to the visit, staff sends the subrecipient a list of all assets acquired to date with federal <br /> funds so that the current status and disposition can be listed prior to the meeting. Monitoring <br /> visits include discussion of any issues specific to the project, review of compliance with <br /> applicable federal requirements, and a visual confirmation of fixed assets purchased with federal <br /> funds. Following the monitoring visit, a follow-up letter is sent to the subrecipient to provide a <br /> written record of the visit and, if applicable to list any recommendations or findings and any <br /> required actions. <br /> Staff from the cities of Pleasanton, Livermore, and Dublin frequently collaborate on monitoring <br /> visits inasmuch as all three cities provide funding to many of the same agencies for the same <br /> programs and services. This system provides several benefits, including efficient use of staff <br /> resources and time, and greater service and convenience for subrecipients. <br /> The City of Pleasanton received positive recognition from HUD for its subrecipient monitoring <br /> procedures through a "Best Practices" award that was received in 1997. <br /> Adlon Plan-FY 2012 <br /> City d Plementon <br /> Page 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.