My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
042312 Special Meeting
>
04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2012 2:41:24 PM
Creation date
4/20/2012 2:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17.36.010 <br /> Chapter 17.36 <br /> GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM* <br /> Sections: <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> 17.36.020 Objectives. <br /> 17.36.030 Building permit restriction. <br /> 17.36.040 Exemptions. <br /> 17.36.050 Administration of the growth management program. <br /> 17.36.060 Establishment of annual new residential unit limits. <br /> 17.36.070 Apportionment of yearly total new residential units to categories of projects. <br /> 17.36.080 Approval procedures. <br /> 17.36.090 Use and loss of growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.100 Modification to projects with growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.110 Fees and exactions. <br /> 17.36.120 Application to prior approved projects. <br /> • <br /> Prior ordinance history:Ords. 1614, 1567,1545, 1538, 1505, 1466, 1413, 1403, 1378,1366,1336. <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> A. Since the mid-1960s, Pleasanton's transformation from a small,agricultural-based community to a suburban bed- <br /> room community and then to a suburban"edge city"has been marked by periods of rapid growth which stressed <br /> the city's ability to provide infrastructure and services, affecting the quality of life of both existing and new resi- <br /> dents. <br /> B. In order to minimize the adverse effects of rapid uncontrolled residential growth,the city council adopted its first <br /> growth management ordinance in 1978,designed to regulate the location and rate of new residential growth in a <br /> period of sewage treatment capacity constraints brought about by air quality degradation concerns. Through the <br /> 1980s and 1990s, the city council modified the growth management ordinance in order to better achieve the <br /> evolving goals set for it,with the rate, location,and type of residential units regulated to achieve the general wel- <br /> fare of the city. <br /> C. In 1996, the city council adopted a comprehensive revision to its general plan. Key goals and policies reflect the <br /> city's continued commitment to developing in an efficient, orderly, and logical fashion, ensuring adequate infra- <br /> structure and services are present to ensure that the city's quality of life and level of services are maintained.The <br /> general plan calls for assuring its citizens of a predictable growth rate,while providing housing to meet the needs <br /> of all economic segments of the community,regional housing needs,and employment growth. <br /> D. Despite the controls established by past versions of the city's growth management program, residential develop- <br /> ment has continued to fluctuate over time,there has been little predictability of the actual number of new building <br /> permits issued and development under construction,and there is uncertainty over the city's ability to maintain its <br /> service levels and quality of life for its citizens due to regional influences and uncertain revenue sources for city <br /> and other local service-providing agencies. <br /> E. This revised growth management program has been designed to rectify the areas wherein the former programs <br /> did not totally succeed; to establish a predictable growth rate which reflects community sentiment and which al- <br /> leviates the potential for strain on the ability of the city and other local service providers to keep pace with ser- <br /> vices with no reduction in their quality; to continue to relate new residential growth to housing needs(including <br /> regional needs and local employment growth) and the availability of infrastructure and services; to move toward <br /> build-out of the community in a logical manner while affording future development areas the ability to accom- <br /> modate changing housing demands;and to be fair and equitable to the development community,developers large <br /> and small, who have either received past approvals under former growth management programs or who have un- <br /> dertaken or will undertake development plans consistent with current goals and policies.(Ord. 1729 §2, 1997) <br /> 463 Pleasanton Supp.No.3.1-10) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.