Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY <br /> populations depending on them continue to objectively.This led to a more systematic and <br /> increase. analytical selection process for investment priorities. <br /> o Local road maintenance programs have been City councils for all 14 cities in the county and the <br /> cut,and road conditions have deteriorated County Board of Supervisors each held public <br /> for all types of users. meetings and voted to approve this expenditure plan <br /> o Bicycle and pedestrian system improvements and recommended submission of the sales tax <br /> and maintenance of pathways have measure to the voters. <br /> continued to deteriorate,making it more <br /> difficult to walk and bike as an alternative to VISION AND GOALS <br /> driving. The development of the Countywide Transportation <br /> • Since the recession began,bus services in Plan and the Transportation Expenditure Plan began <br /> Alameda County have been cut significantly,and with establishing a new vision and goals for the <br /> the gap between road maintenance needs and county's transportation system: <br /> available funding is at an all-time high.This new <br /> expenditure plan will allow local funding to fill Alameda County will be served by a premier <br /> in the gaps created by declining state and federal transportation system that supports a vibrant and <br /> livable Alameda County through a connected and <br /> revenue and will keep needed services in place integrated multimodal transportation system <br /> and restore service cuts for many providers. promoting sustainability,access,transit operations, <br /> public health and economic opportunities. <br /> HOW THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED <br /> The vision recognizes the need to maintain and <br /> This expenditure plan was developed in conjunction operate the County's existing transportation <br /> with the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan infrastructure and services while developing new <br /> (CWTP),the long range policy document that guides investments that are targeted,effective, financially <br /> transportation investments, programs, policies and sound and supported by appropriate land uses. <br /> advocacy for Alameda County through 2040. A Mobility in Alameda County will be guided by <br /> Steering Committee and two working groups transparent decision-making and measureable <br /> (technical and community)were established to guide performance indicators,and will be supported by <br /> development of both the CWTP and the TEP over the these goals: <br /> past two years. <br /> Our transportation system will be: <br /> Public engagement and transparency were the • Multimodal(bus, train,ferry,bicycle,walking <br /> foundations of the development of these plans.A and driving) <br /> wide variety of stakeholders,including businesses, <br /> technical experts,environmental and social justice • Accessible,affordable and equitable for people of <br /> organizations,seniors and people with disabilities, all ages,incomes,abilities and geographies <br /> helped shape the plan to ensure that it serves the • Integrated with land use patterns and local <br /> county's diverse transportation needs.Thousands of <br /> Alameda County residents participated through decision-making <br /> ' public workshops and facilitated small group • Connected across the county,within and across <br /> dialogues;a website allowed for online the network of streets,highways,transit,bicycle <br /> questionnaires,access to all project information,and and pedestrian routes <br /> submittal of comments;and advisory committees that <br /> represent diverse constituencies were integrally • Reliable and efficient <br /> involved in the plan development process from the Cost effective <br /> beginning. <br /> • Well maintained <br /> ) The TEP also benefited from a performance-based • Safe <br /> VI project evaluation process undertaken for the CWTP. <br /> 1 This allowed policies and goals to be expressed in • Supportive of a healthy and clean environment 'j <br /> quantifiable terms and competing transportation <br /> 4' investments to be compared to one another Ei <br /> N <br /> 1 <br /> Alamo 17,C()tin t y Trar$sp9,rt tiara.-EX.pe rt."ttur;C Rf io 7; r. 4 <br />